Legislative and Jurisprudential Landmarks on Postal Voting

T. Toader, Marieta Safta
{"title":"Legislative and Jurisprudential Landmarks on Postal Voting","authors":"T. Toader, Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having examined the regulations on the matter, it is found that this voting method essentially refers to the casting of votes by mail, either directly to the appropriate electoral authority of the voter’s electoral district of his/her country of origin, or to his/her country’s embassy or consulate that has jurisdiction over the voter. As a general rule, ballots are mailed to voters together with an inner and an outer envelope. The filled-in ballot paper is placed in the inner envelope which is then placed in the outer envelope and sent by mail. As a main rule, the postal service is free of charge. The main advantage of postal voting consists in facilitating the exercise of the right to vote for oversees voters. Further below, we will provide certain legislative and jurisprudential landmarks on postal voting, building on the general framework given by the constitutional rules which enshrine political rights, and particularising with examples from the case-law of certain constitutional courts which were called upon to adjudicate on the constitutionality of the regulations concerning this method for the exercise of the right to vote.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Having examined the regulations on the matter, it is found that this voting method essentially refers to the casting of votes by mail, either directly to the appropriate electoral authority of the voter’s electoral district of his/her country of origin, or to his/her country’s embassy or consulate that has jurisdiction over the voter. As a general rule, ballots are mailed to voters together with an inner and an outer envelope. The filled-in ballot paper is placed in the inner envelope which is then placed in the outer envelope and sent by mail. As a main rule, the postal service is free of charge. The main advantage of postal voting consists in facilitating the exercise of the right to vote for oversees voters. Further below, we will provide certain legislative and jurisprudential landmarks on postal voting, building on the general framework given by the constitutional rules which enshrine political rights, and particularising with examples from the case-law of certain constitutional courts which were called upon to adjudicate on the constitutionality of the regulations concerning this method for the exercise of the right to vote.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邮政投票的立法与法理标志
在审查了有关规定后发现,这种投票方式基本上是指通过邮寄方式投票,直接投给选民原籍国选区的有关选举当局,或投给对该选民有管辖权的该国使领馆。一般来说,选票会连同一个内信封和一个外信封一起邮寄给选民。填好的选票放在内信封里,然后放在外信封里,邮寄出去。一般来说,邮政服务是免费的。邮寄投票的主要优点在于便于监督的选民行使投票权。在下文中,我们将根据规定政治权利的宪法规则所提供的一般框架,提供关于邮政投票的某些立法和法理上的里程碑,并特别举出某些宪法法院的判例法的例子,这些法院被要求就有关行使投票权的这种方法的规定是否符合宪法作出裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1