A Study of Written Noun Pattern Sequences among Secondary School Students in Malaysia

Shafinaz Sikder, Nur Filzah Ahmad Nadzri, Laneesha Karunagaran
{"title":"A Study of Written Noun Pattern Sequences among Secondary School Students in Malaysia","authors":"Shafinaz Sikder, Nur Filzah Ahmad Nadzri, Laneesha Karunagaran","doi":"10.3126/nelta.v26i1-2.45198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following research work aimed to investigate the language change of learners through their usage of noun pattern in order to identify which words occur with which patterns and then create a repertoire of the three learners’ particular ways of using them. In order to do so, like previous studies, the study relied on the theoretical framework of Hunston’s Pattern Grammar Approach (1997) and the conceptual framework of Larsen-Freeman’s Complexity Theory (2006). This mixed method study adopted a longitudinal research approach into Chau (2015) students’ data to observe the commonly occurred noun pattern sequences within their writing tasks over three years. This helped to understand the changes on the noun pattern about language learning by associating meaning production via noun pattern sequences. Data collection and analysis method was adopted from Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010. The codification of noun patterns were done quantitatively and then its frequency was quantified. The five nouns have been identified from the analysis at keyness cut-off of 25 via Keywords Extractor followed by a codification of noun pattern sequences done via the framework by Collins Cobuild English Dictionary and Francis et al. (1998). The result of the analysis shows that students do follow noun patterns yet they also tend to produce structures in their very unique ways. Likewise, the repetition of pattern over the years observed in learners suggests language could be both regressing and progressing simultaneously, unlike the developmental leader metaphor applied in most educational settings. In other words, the study suggests that students should be acquainted with patterns instead of words in isolation because their association with different words makes them a natural accompaniment to a lexical approach. This paves the way for unorthodox scoring or marking system, shifting the focus from error analysis to meaningful production of language.","PeriodicalId":416929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nelta","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nelta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v26i1-2.45198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following research work aimed to investigate the language change of learners through their usage of noun pattern in order to identify which words occur with which patterns and then create a repertoire of the three learners’ particular ways of using them. In order to do so, like previous studies, the study relied on the theoretical framework of Hunston’s Pattern Grammar Approach (1997) and the conceptual framework of Larsen-Freeman’s Complexity Theory (2006). This mixed method study adopted a longitudinal research approach into Chau (2015) students’ data to observe the commonly occurred noun pattern sequences within their writing tasks over three years. This helped to understand the changes on the noun pattern about language learning by associating meaning production via noun pattern sequences. Data collection and analysis method was adopted from Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010. The codification of noun patterns were done quantitatively and then its frequency was quantified. The five nouns have been identified from the analysis at keyness cut-off of 25 via Keywords Extractor followed by a codification of noun pattern sequences done via the framework by Collins Cobuild English Dictionary and Francis et al. (1998). The result of the analysis shows that students do follow noun patterns yet they also tend to produce structures in their very unique ways. Likewise, the repetition of pattern over the years observed in learners suggests language could be both regressing and progressing simultaneously, unlike the developmental leader metaphor applied in most educational settings. In other words, the study suggests that students should be acquainted with patterns instead of words in isolation because their association with different words makes them a natural accompaniment to a lexical approach. This paves the way for unorthodox scoring or marking system, shifting the focus from error analysis to meaningful production of language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚中学生书面名词模式序列研究
下面的研究工作旨在通过学习者对名词模式的使用来调查他们的语言变化,以确定哪些单词与哪些模式一起出现,然后创建一个三个学习者使用它们的特定方式的曲目。为了做到这一点,与以往的研究一样,本研究依赖于Hunston的模式语法方法(1997)的理论框架和Larsen-Freeman的复杂性理论(2006)的概念框架。本混合方法研究采用纵向研究的方法,对Chau(2015)学生三年多的写作任务中常见的名词模式序列进行观察。这有助于理解通过名词模式序列联想意义产生对语言学习名词模式的影响。数据收集和分析方法采用Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010。对名词模式进行了量化编纂,并对其频率进行了量化。这五个名词是通过关键词提取器在关键字截断值25处进行分析后识别出来的,然后通过Collins Cobuild英语词典和Francis等人(1998)的框架对名词模式序列进行编码。分析结果表明,学生确实遵循名词模式,但他们也倾向于以自己独特的方式构建结构。同样,多年来在学习者身上观察到的模式重复表明,语言可以同时倒退和进步,这与大多数教育环境中应用的发展性领导者比喻不同。换句话说,这项研究表明,学生应该熟悉模式,而不是孤立的单词,因为它们与不同单词的联系使它们成为词汇学习方法的自然伴侣。这为非正统的评分或评分系统铺平了道路,将重点从错误分析转移到有意义的语言生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mentoring Teachers during Covid-19: A Collaborative Organizational Approach Coping Strategies of University EFL Teachers for Online Instruction during COVID-19 in Nepal Practical issues for conducting qualitative research ELT in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Working with Machines Fundamentals of Academic Writing: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1