Applying the retrospective think-aloud protocol in usability evaluations with children: Seeing through children's eyes

A. Al-Wabil, Luluah Al-Husian, Rana Al-Murshad, Abeer N. Al-Nafjan
{"title":"Applying the retrospective think-aloud protocol in usability evaluations with children: Seeing through children's eyes","authors":"A. Al-Wabil, Luluah Al-Husian, Rana Al-Murshad, Abeer N. Al-Nafjan","doi":"10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a study of usability testing with children in which stimulated retrospective probing was examined to determine its efficacy and usefulness. Ten children were involved in the evaluation of two different web sites. The session involved tracking their eyes as they conducted four tasks, two navigational and two informational tasks. Accuracy and efficiency and eye movement metrics were collected, and child participants rated their subjective satisfaction with the sites. Retrospective probing was conducted to elicit verbalizations of problems that children experienced in their use of these sites. The retrospective think-aloud (RTA) protocol was used along with eye gaze replay in post-session interviews. Findings show that the stimulated RTA protocol with eyetracking is effective in eliciting explanatory information about what children attend to in usability evaluations and how they process information, and how children arrived at a target element or solution. Implications for usability practitioners are discussed.","PeriodicalId":431661,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper describes a study of usability testing with children in which stimulated retrospective probing was examined to determine its efficacy and usefulness. Ten children were involved in the evaluation of two different web sites. The session involved tracking their eyes as they conducted four tasks, two navigational and two informational tasks. Accuracy and efficiency and eye movement metrics were collected, and child participants rated their subjective satisfaction with the sites. Retrospective probing was conducted to elicit verbalizations of problems that children experienced in their use of these sites. The retrospective think-aloud (RTA) protocol was used along with eye gaze replay in post-session interviews. Findings show that the stimulated RTA protocol with eyetracking is effective in eliciting explanatory information about what children attend to in usability evaluations and how they process information, and how children arrived at a target element or solution. Implications for usability practitioners are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童可用性评估中应用回顾性思考方案:透过儿童的眼睛看
本文描述了一项对儿童进行可用性测试的研究,其中对刺激回顾性探查进行了检查,以确定其有效性和有用性。10名儿童参与了对两个不同网站的评估。研究人员在受试者完成四项任务时跟踪他们的眼睛,其中两项是导航任务,另两项是信息任务。收集了准确性、效率和眼球运动指标,儿童参与者对网站的主观满意度进行了评分。回顾性探查是为了引出儿童在使用这些网站时所经历的问题的语言表达。回顾性的有声思考(RTA)方案与眼睛注视回放在会后访谈中使用。研究结果表明,眼球追踪的刺激RTA协议可以有效地引出关于儿童在可用性评估中关注什么、他们如何处理信息以及儿童如何到达目标元素或解决方案的解释性信息。讨论了对可用性实践者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An overview of Human-Computer Interaction patterns in pervasive systems How the agent's gender influence users' evaluation of a QA system A comparison of audio and tactile displays for non-visual target selection tasks Equipment Management System (EqMS): Information visualization system perspectives Information elements of a website that promotes trust in e-commerce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1