Rejoinder from the Author

Yota Negishi
{"title":"Rejoinder from the Author","authors":"Yota Negishi","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis rejoinder is to provide author’s answers to the questions posed by commentators. The first issues is the analytical scope and methods in comparison between the Inter-American and European Courts of Human Rights. The author particularly responds to the lack of analysis on social rights. The second issue is the political backlashes against the judicial control by human rights courts. The author replies that the role of “political”conventionality control complementing the judiciaries is of importance.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This rejoinder is to provide author’s answers to the questions posed by commentators. The first issues is the analytical scope and methods in comparison between the Inter-American and European Courts of Human Rights. The author particularly responds to the lack of analysis on social rights. The second issue is the political backlashes against the judicial control by human rights courts. The author replies that the role of “political”conventionality control complementing the judiciaries is of importance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者的反驳
本文是对评论者提出的问题的回答。第一个问题是比较美洲人权法院和欧洲人权法院的分析范围和方法。作者特别回应了缺乏对社会权利的分析。第二个问题是对人权法院司法控制的政治反弹。作者回答说,“政治”惯例控制补充司法机构的作用是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction in Transboundary Environmental Litigations The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) tfeu in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations Authorisations to Emit Greenhouse Gases – A Conflict-of-Laws Perspective Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1