The Claims Resolution Tribunal and Holocaust Claims Against Swiss Banks

R. Alford
{"title":"The Claims Resolution Tribunal and Holocaust Claims Against Swiss Banks","authors":"R. Alford","doi":"10.15779/Z38C069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the legal challenges for implementing settlements for Holocaust reparation claims to Swiss bank accounts. It specifically discusses the activities related to the settlement of these claims undertaken by the Independent Committtee of Eminent Persons (Volcker Commission). The article's first section presents historical information about Holocaust claims against Swiss banks. Specifically, it attempts to answer the question of why it has taken so long for Holocaust reparation claims against Swiss banks to be processed. The author blames this delay primarily on the \"obfuscation by the Swiss banks and the inattention of the Swiss government[,]\" which is indicated by the fact that a complete accounting of the banks' Holocaust-era activities was not publicized until the mid 1990's under the direction of the Volcker Commission. Next, the article provides information about the Claims Resolution Tribunal's claims resolution procedures. This tribunal, established by the Volcker Commission, was charged with arbitrating Holocaust reparation claims brought by private citizens against Swiss banks. It explains how claims resolutions procedures were modified throughout the history of the tribunal to expedite the process and ensure that the tribunal focused only on those claims that were truly related to losses caused by the Holocaust. This is followed by an analysis of the most challenging legal issues related to resolving Holocaust claims against Swiss banks, including burden of proof and plausibility problems, choice of law conflicts, and difficulties in determining whether claimants were truly descended from Holocaust victims. The article concludes with a discussion of what reparation and restitution claims accomplish in terms of \"moral accounting\" to the families of the victims, and the damage done to all the parties involved by the banks' failure to address their moral responsibilities related to Holocaust claims in a timely matter.","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38C069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses the legal challenges for implementing settlements for Holocaust reparation claims to Swiss bank accounts. It specifically discusses the activities related to the settlement of these claims undertaken by the Independent Committtee of Eminent Persons (Volcker Commission). The article's first section presents historical information about Holocaust claims against Swiss banks. Specifically, it attempts to answer the question of why it has taken so long for Holocaust reparation claims against Swiss banks to be processed. The author blames this delay primarily on the "obfuscation by the Swiss banks and the inattention of the Swiss government[,]" which is indicated by the fact that a complete accounting of the banks' Holocaust-era activities was not publicized until the mid 1990's under the direction of the Volcker Commission. Next, the article provides information about the Claims Resolution Tribunal's claims resolution procedures. This tribunal, established by the Volcker Commission, was charged with arbitrating Holocaust reparation claims brought by private citizens against Swiss banks. It explains how claims resolutions procedures were modified throughout the history of the tribunal to expedite the process and ensure that the tribunal focused only on those claims that were truly related to losses caused by the Holocaust. This is followed by an analysis of the most challenging legal issues related to resolving Holocaust claims against Swiss banks, including burden of proof and plausibility problems, choice of law conflicts, and difficulties in determining whether claimants were truly descended from Holocaust victims. The article concludes with a discussion of what reparation and restitution claims accomplish in terms of "moral accounting" to the families of the victims, and the damage done to all the parties involved by the banks' failure to address their moral responsibilities related to Holocaust claims in a timely matter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
索赔解决法庭和针对瑞士银行的大屠杀索赔
本文讨论了在瑞士银行账户执行大屠杀赔偿索赔解决方案时面临的法律挑战。报告具体讨论了知名人士独立委员会(沃尔克委员会)为解决这些索赔所开展的有关活动。文章的第一部分介绍了针对瑞士银行的大屠杀索赔的历史信息。具体来说,它试图回答为什么对瑞士银行的大屠杀赔偿要求花了这么长时间才得到处理的问题。作者将这一延迟主要归咎于“瑞士银行的混淆和瑞士政府的疏忽”,事实表明,直到20世纪90年代中期,在沃尔克委员会的指导下,才公布了银行大屠杀时期活动的完整账目。接下来,文章提供了有关索赔解决审裁处的索赔解决程序的信息。这个法庭由沃尔克委员会(Volcker Commission)设立,负责仲裁公民个人对瑞士银行提出的大屠杀赔偿要求。它解释了在整个法庭历史上如何修改索赔解决程序,以加快这一进程,并确保法庭只关注那些真正与大屠杀造成的损失有关的索赔要求。随后分析了与解决针对瑞士银行的大屠杀索赔有关的最具挑战性的法律问题,包括举证责任和合理性问题、法律选择冲突以及确定索赔人是否真正是大屠杀受害者后裔的困难。文章最后讨论了赔偿和恢复索赔在对受害者家属的“道德核算”方面所取得的成就,以及由于银行未能及时履行其与大屠杀索赔有关的道德责任而对所有当事方造成的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maritime Interdiction of North Korean Ships under UN Sanctions The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship Back in the Game: International Humanitarian Lawmaking by States International Law and Corporate Participation in Times of Armed Conflict Reversing the Two Wrong Turns in the Economic Analysis of International Law: A Club Goods Theory of Treaty Membership & European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1