Comparative Analysis of Optic Nerve Diameter Using Ultrasonography Between Normotensives and Preeclamptic Patients at University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria

Adebimpe Olamide Bello, A. Ogunsemoyin, Joseph Irewole Fatukasi, Lawal Olawale Oyeneyin, Babatola Bakare, S. Osho, Samuel Olayode Oyamakinde, Matthew Adeniran Adeyemo
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Optic Nerve Diameter Using Ultrasonography Between Normotensives and Preeclamptic Patients at University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria","authors":"Adebimpe Olamide Bello, A. Ogunsemoyin, Joseph Irewole Fatukasi, Lawal Olawale Oyeneyin, Babatola Bakare, S. Osho, Samuel Olayode Oyamakinde, Matthew Adeniran Adeyemo","doi":"10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is an established fact that obstetric patients withpreeclampsia do have increased optic nerve diameter compared with normotensive patients. Ultrasonography is increasingly advocated as a valuable screening tool for evaluating the optic nerve diameter as a surrogate marker for raised intracranial pressure due to its noninvasive nature, low cost, portability, dynamic real-time assessment and rapid performance. Thisstudy aims to compare the ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve diameter between two groups of preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women.\nMethodology: This cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at the Department of Radiology, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, (UNIMEDTHC), Ondo State, Nigeria. It consisted of 90 preeclamptic (study) and 90 normotensives (control) aged-matched pregnant women. The optic nerve diameters were measured by the radiologistusing a high frequency linear ultrasound probe (7.5–12 MHz).Results: The optic nerve diameter as measured by ocular ultrasound scan was statistically significantly higher (p-value of <0.05) in preeclamptic patients compared to normotensives with a mean of 6.22 ± 0.83 mm versus 4.50 ± 0.69 mm, respectively.\nConclusion: Ocular ultrasound scan for measurement of optic nerve diameter is a reliable screening tool for assessing raised intracranial pressure in preeclamptic patients when compared to normotensive ones. Therefore, it is recommended that performing non-invasive ocular ultrasound scans be advocated for all pregnant women with or at risk of preeclampsia.","PeriodicalId":113708,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is an established fact that obstetric patients withpreeclampsia do have increased optic nerve diameter compared with normotensive patients. Ultrasonography is increasingly advocated as a valuable screening tool for evaluating the optic nerve diameter as a surrogate marker for raised intracranial pressure due to its noninvasive nature, low cost, portability, dynamic real-time assessment and rapid performance. Thisstudy aims to compare the ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve diameter between two groups of preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. Methodology: This cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at the Department of Radiology, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, (UNIMEDTHC), Ondo State, Nigeria. It consisted of 90 preeclamptic (study) and 90 normotensives (control) aged-matched pregnant women. The optic nerve diameters were measured by the radiologistusing a high frequency linear ultrasound probe (7.5–12 MHz).Results: The optic nerve diameter as measured by ocular ultrasound scan was statistically significantly higher (p-value of <0.05) in preeclamptic patients compared to normotensives with a mean of 6.22 ± 0.83 mm versus 4.50 ± 0.69 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Ocular ultrasound scan for measurement of optic nerve diameter is a reliable screening tool for assessing raised intracranial pressure in preeclamptic patients when compared to normotensive ones. Therefore, it is recommended that performing non-invasive ocular ultrasound scans be advocated for all pregnant women with or at risk of preeclampsia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚Ondo医科大学教学医院正常血压患者与子痫前期患者视神经直径超声对比分析
背景:与血压正常的患者相比,产科先兆子痫患者的视神经直径确实增加,这是一个既定的事实。超声检查因其无创、低成本、便携、动态实时、快速等优点,越来越被推崇为评价视神经直径作为颅内压升高的替代标志物的有价值的筛查工具。本研究旨在比较两组子痫前期和血压正常孕妇视神经直径的超声测量结果。方法:这项横断面描述性研究是在尼日利亚翁多州医科大学教学医院(UNIMEDTHC)放射学系进行的。它包括90名先兆子痫(研究)和90名血压正常(对照组)的年龄匹配的孕妇。放射科医师使用高频线性超声探头(7.5-12 MHz)测量视神经直径。结果:子痫前期患者的视神经直径(平均为6.22±0.83 mm)明显高于血压正常者(平均为4.50±0.69 mm), p值均<0.05。结论:与血压正常的患者相比,眼超声扫描测量视神经直径是评估子痫前期患者颅内压升高的可靠筛查工具。因此,建议对所有患有或有子痫前期风险的孕妇进行非侵入性眼部超声扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Masses in the Right Upper Quadrant using Ultrasound Imaging: A Comprehensive Diagnostic Approach for Clinical Evaluation in Bangladesh Spinal Trauma Revealing a Metastatic Medullary Lesion: A Case Report Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs) Prevention Practices Among Medical Students in a Teaching Hospital in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria The Pattern of COVID-19 Patients at King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail Region, Saudi Arabia Locally Acquired Malaria in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1