The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?

Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic, S. Domaradzki
{"title":"The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?","authors":"Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic, S. Domaradzki","doi":"10.2298/medjp2203391r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By employing the concept of raison d??tat, the article questions the European\n Union?s role in the so-called Western Balkan region. While the region\n continues to be covered by the EU?s enlargement policy, we argue that the\n policy has been in paralysis. We explore whether the heightened geopolitical\n tensions in Europe have brought the EU to a turning point at which it would\n use its enlargement policy decisively to pursue its strategic interests in\n the region. We start with a theoretical discussion of raison d??tat and its\n instrumentalization in the context of the European Union as a non-state\n actor. Then, we use the conceptual benchmarks of the raison d??tat to\n analyze its empirical implementation through the EU?s relations with Western\n Balkan countries. We explore the EU?s available enlargement policy tools and\n the diverging positions within the EU towards enlargement. We pay special\n attention to the ?New enlargement methodology? devised by the Commission in\n 2019. We argue that despite the Commission?s efforts to promote the EU?s\n common interest in the region framed in a geopolitical narrative, the\n diverging national interests still preclude the EU from aggregating its own\n and pursuing its raison d??tat towards the region. The ?new methodology?\n does nothing to overcome this situation. What is more, by insisting on a\n ?stronger political steer? and by further facilitating the reversal of the\n accession process, the document pushes the Union further away from a common\n ground regarding the enlargement.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2203391r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

By employing the concept of raison d??tat, the article questions the European Union?s role in the so-called Western Balkan region. While the region continues to be covered by the EU?s enlargement policy, we argue that the policy has been in paralysis. We explore whether the heightened geopolitical tensions in Europe have brought the EU to a turning point at which it would use its enlargement policy decisively to pursue its strategic interests in the region. We start with a theoretical discussion of raison d??tat and its instrumentalization in the context of the European Union as a non-state actor. Then, we use the conceptual benchmarks of the raison d??tat to analyze its empirical implementation through the EU?s relations with Western Balkan countries. We explore the EU?s available enlargement policy tools and the diverging positions within the EU towards enlargement. We pay special attention to the ?New enlargement methodology? devised by the Commission in 2019. We argue that despite the Commission?s efforts to promote the EU?s common interest in the region framed in a geopolitical narrative, the diverging national interests still preclude the EU from aggregating its own and pursuing its raison d??tat towards the region. The ?new methodology? does nothing to overcome this situation. What is more, by insisting on a ?stronger political steer? and by further facilitating the reversal of the accession process, the document pushes the Union further away from a common ground regarding the enlargement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟在西巴尔干地区采取行动的理由:新的扩大方法能有所帮助吗?
通过运用理性的概念??这篇文章质疑欧盟?美国在所谓的西巴尔干地区的作用。而该地区继续受到欧盟的保护?我们认为,美国的东扩政策一直处于瘫痪状态。我们将探讨欧洲地缘政治紧张局势的加剧是否将欧盟带到了一个转折点,在这个转折点上,欧盟将果断地利用其扩大政策来追求其在该地区的战略利益。我们从理性的理论讨论开始??在欧盟作为非国家行为体的背景下,它的工具化。然后,我们使用理性的概念基准。如何通过欧盟来分析其实证实施?中国与西巴尔干国家的关系。我们探索欧盟?欧盟现有的扩员政策工具,以及欧盟内部对扩员的分歧立场。我们特别关注新的扩大方法。由欧盟委员会于2019年制定。我们认为,尽管委员会?中国为推广欧盟所做的努力?尽管欧盟在该地区的共同利益是以地缘政治叙事为框架的,但各国利益的分歧仍阻碍了欧盟凝聚自身利益并追求自身利益的合理性。朝这个地区走去。新方法?无法克服这种情况。更重要的是,通过坚持更强有力的政治引导?通过进一步促进加入进程的逆转,该文件使欧盟在扩大问题上进一步远离共同基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The roots of the idea of humanitarian intervention in De Iure Belli ac Pacis by Hugo Grotius The prospects of U.S.-Russian relations in the light of war in Ukraine: “Containment 2.0.” The sword of Damocles in global stability China’s 21st century geopolitics and geo-economics: An evidence from the Western Balkans The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1