{"title":"RESTRIÇÕES À ACESSIBILIDADE DAS CONSTRUÇÕES RELATIVAS EM LÍNGUAS DOS TRONCOS TUPI E MACRO-JÊ","authors":"Gabriela Oliveira-Condinhoto","doi":"10.29327/212034.7.1-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at describing and discussing the restrictions on the accessibility of relative clauses in Tupi and Macro-Jê languages, seeking evidence to confirm the revision of the Keenan and Comrie Accessibility Hierarchy (1977) proposed by Dik (1997). The pioneering work of Keenan and Comrie (1977) selects essentially syntactic criteria for defining the restrictions on the accessibility of relative clauses, criteria that are easily criticized in the light of functionalist theories, which admit neither the supremacy nor the independence of the syntax for the determination of linguistic processes. Thus, the critiques of AH by Keenan and Comrie (1977) concern both empirical reasons some languages have no way of constructing relative sentences and theoretical reasons syntactic functions are not universally relevant. The analysis material is composed of eight Brazilian indigenous languages, studied from grammars and other descriptive manuals.","PeriodicalId":285093,"journal":{"name":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","volume":"63 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/212034.7.1-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims at describing and discussing the restrictions on the accessibility of relative clauses in Tupi and Macro-Jê languages, seeking evidence to confirm the revision of the Keenan and Comrie Accessibility Hierarchy (1977) proposed by Dik (1997). The pioneering work of Keenan and Comrie (1977) selects essentially syntactic criteria for defining the restrictions on the accessibility of relative clauses, criteria that are easily criticized in the light of functionalist theories, which admit neither the supremacy nor the independence of the syntax for the determination of linguistic processes. Thus, the critiques of AH by Keenan and Comrie (1977) concern both empirical reasons some languages have no way of constructing relative sentences and theoretical reasons syntactic functions are not universally relevant. The analysis material is composed of eight Brazilian indigenous languages, studied from grammars and other descriptive manuals.
本文旨在描述和讨论Tupi语言和Macro-Jê语言中关系分句可及性的限制,为Dik(1997)提出的Keenan and Comrie可及性层次(1977)的修正寻找证据。基南(Keenan)和科姆里(Comrie)(1977)的开创性工作基本上选择了语法标准来定义关系分句可及性的限制,这些标准很容易受到功能主义理论的批评,功能主义理论既不承认句法的至高无上性,也不承认句法在决定语言过程中的独立性。因此,Keenan和Comrie(1977)对AH的批评既涉及经验原因,也涉及一些语言无法构建相对句子的理论原因,以及句法功能不是普遍相关的理论原因。分析材料由八种巴西土著语言组成,从语法和其他描述性手册中学习。