Public Interest Litigation in the Netherlands – A Multidimensional Take on the Promotion of Environmental Interests by Private Parties Through the Courts

Berthy van den Broek, L. Enneking
{"title":"Public Interest Litigation in the Netherlands – A Multidimensional Take on the Promotion of Environmental Interests by Private Parties Through the Courts","authors":"Berthy van den Broek, L. Enneking","doi":"10.18352/ULR.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Netherlands, the administrative law system is traditionally seen as best suited for dealing with public interest-related lawsuits. Especially in the field of environmental law, NGOs seeking to promote broader environmental interests regularly initiate judicial procedures before administrative courts in order to challenge land-use plans, environmental permits and other types of public orders that may have adverse impacts on local natural habitats and/or the environment more generally. However, over the past five years a number of developments have resulted in a more restricted access to administrative courts for environmental NGOs. It has been suggested that these developments may result in an increased reliance on public interest-related procedures before civil courts. This raises the question of what position public interest-related claims, like those against Shell for oil pollution in the Niger Delta and those against the Dutch government for its alleged failure to implement adequate climate change policies, currently have within the Dutch system of civil procedure. It also raises the question whether environmental NGOs in practice do have the broad access to Dutch courts that is required by international obligations, and whether room for improvement should perhaps be sought in the civil law domain.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/ULR.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the Netherlands, the administrative law system is traditionally seen as best suited for dealing with public interest-related lawsuits. Especially in the field of environmental law, NGOs seeking to promote broader environmental interests regularly initiate judicial procedures before administrative courts in order to challenge land-use plans, environmental permits and other types of public orders that may have adverse impacts on local natural habitats and/or the environment more generally. However, over the past five years a number of developments have resulted in a more restricted access to administrative courts for environmental NGOs. It has been suggested that these developments may result in an increased reliance on public interest-related procedures before civil courts. This raises the question of what position public interest-related claims, like those against Shell for oil pollution in the Niger Delta and those against the Dutch government for its alleged failure to implement adequate climate change policies, currently have within the Dutch system of civil procedure. It also raises the question whether environmental NGOs in practice do have the broad access to Dutch courts that is required by international obligations, and whether room for improvement should perhaps be sought in the civil law domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰的公益诉讼——从多角度看私人当事人通过法院促进环境利益
在荷兰,行政法制度传统上被视为最适合处理与公共利益有关的诉讼。特别是在环境法领域,寻求促进更广泛的环境利益的非政府组织经常向行政法院提起司法程序,以挑战土地使用计划、环境许可证和其他可能对当地自然生境和/或更普遍的环境产生不利影响的公共命令。然而,在过去的五年中,一些发展导致环保非政府组织在行政法院的机会受到更大的限制。有人认为,这些发展可能会导致民事法院更多地依赖与公共利益有关的程序。这就提出了一个问题:与公共利益相关的索赔,比如针对壳牌石油在尼日尔三角洲的石油污染的索赔,以及针对荷兰政府据称未能实施适当的气候变化政策的索赔,目前在荷兰民事诉讼体系中处于什么地位?它还提出了一个问题,即环保非政府组织在实践中是否确实享有国际义务所要求的广泛的诉诸荷兰法院的权利,以及是否应该在民法领域寻求改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of Administrative Discretion: A Case Study of Pakistan The Tension between Global Public Procurement Law and Nationalist/Populist Tendencies: Proposals for Reform Inhabiting Different Realities: Incrementalism, Paradigms and the New Prospect Public Administration Reform in Bulgaria: Top-down and Externally-driven Approach Una Revisión a Los Servicios Públicos de Solidaridad en la Unión Europea (A Review to the Notion of Social Services of General Interest in the European Union )
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1