The Relative Riskiness of Various Asset Focus Alternatives in Banking

Mitchell Stan, M. L. McIntyre
{"title":"The Relative Riskiness of Various Asset Focus Alternatives in Banking","authors":"Mitchell Stan, M. L. McIntyre","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1457359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines whether the risk of focused banks is higher than that of diversified ones. Focused banks are defined as those with a large proportion of assets in one of six narrow industry segments including agricultural loans, credit cards, commercial lending, mortgage lending, consumer lending, and other focused loans.This study takes a bank supervisor approach rather than adopting the perspective of a shareholder. It differs from similar work in the past because it compares focused banks to a sample including only diversified banks. Other studies, in contrast, compared one focused peer group to a comparator group of all banks but for the one focused group. Thus, the comparator group included both diversified and focused banks. The data in this study confirms the major hypothesis that banks following a diversified strategy are less risky than banks following an industry-focused approach. Interestingly, our study finds that, despite being more risky, the focused groups reported return-on-asset ratios below those of the diversified comparator groups in the majority of our comparisons.","PeriodicalId":326490,"journal":{"name":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1457359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research examines whether the risk of focused banks is higher than that of diversified ones. Focused banks are defined as those with a large proportion of assets in one of six narrow industry segments including agricultural loans, credit cards, commercial lending, mortgage lending, consumer lending, and other focused loans.This study takes a bank supervisor approach rather than adopting the perspective of a shareholder. It differs from similar work in the past because it compares focused banks to a sample including only diversified banks. Other studies, in contrast, compared one focused peer group to a comparator group of all banks but for the one focused group. Thus, the comparator group included both diversified and focused banks. The data in this study confirms the major hypothesis that banks following a diversified strategy are less risky than banks following an industry-focused approach. Interestingly, our study finds that, despite being more risky, the focused groups reported return-on-asset ratios below those of the diversified comparator groups in the majority of our comparisons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业各种资产重点选择的相对风险
本研究考察了集中型银行的风险是否高于多元化银行。重点银行被定义为那些在农业贷款、信用卡、商业贷款、抵押贷款、消费贷款和其他重点贷款等六个狭窄行业之一拥有大量资产的银行。本研究采用银行监管者的视角,而非股东的视角。它与过去的类似研究不同,因为它将重点银行与只包括多元化银行的样本进行了比较。相比之下,其他研究将一个重点关注的同行群体与除一个重点关注群体外的所有银行的比较群体进行了比较。因此,比较组既包括多元化银行,也包括重点银行。本研究中的数据证实了一个主要假设,即采用多元化策略的银行比采用行业聚焦策略的银行风险更小。有趣的是,我们的研究发现,尽管风险更大,但在大多数比较中,重点小组报告的资产收益率低于多元化比较小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time Variation in Asset Return Dependence: Strength or Structure? Discount or Premium? Diversification, Firm Value, and Capital Budgeting Efficiency The Relationship Between Pricing Policies and Measures of the Economic Independence of Rating Agencies: Evidence from Fitch, Moody's and S&P Prudential Supervision, Banking and Economic Progress: Implementation of Risk Management Procedures in Joint Stock Banks in Vietnam The Privatisation Experience in Banking and Insurance in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1