Comparison of DQDB and FDDI MAC access protocols

S. Ghani, M. Schwartz
{"title":"Comparison of DQDB and FDDI MAC access protocols","authors":"S. Ghani, M. Schwartz","doi":"10.1109/LCN.1991.208053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison of the MAC access protocols of the IEEE 802.6 DQDB MAN and FDDI standards is presented. The results are derived from simulation studies, and verified by analytical approximations. The comparison is based on average packet access delays of nodes on DQDB and FDDI networks. By setting the available bandwidth of the two networks to be equal, the authors draw broad conclusions regarding the relative strengths and weaknesses of each protocol. The results show the relative effect of varying various network parameters such as token rotation time, geographic size of the network, number of stations and total bandwidth on packet delay for the two protocols.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":163373,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings 16th Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings 16th Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.1991.208053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A comparison of the MAC access protocols of the IEEE 802.6 DQDB MAN and FDDI standards is presented. The results are derived from simulation studies, and verified by analytical approximations. The comparison is based on average packet access delays of nodes on DQDB and FDDI networks. By setting the available bandwidth of the two networks to be equal, the authors draw broad conclusions regarding the relative strengths and weaknesses of each protocol. The results show the relative effect of varying various network parameters such as token rotation time, geographic size of the network, number of stations and total bandwidth on packet delay for the two protocols.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DQDB和FDDI MAC访问协议的比较
对IEEE 802.6 DQDB城域网和FDDI标准的MAC接入协议进行了比较。结果来源于仿真研究,并通过解析近似加以验证。比较是基于DQDB和FDDI网络上节点的平均分组访问延迟。通过将两个网络的可用带宽设置为相等,作者得出了关于每个协议的相对优势和劣势的广泛结论。结果显示了不同的网络参数,如令牌旋转时间、网络的地理大小、站点数量和总带宽对两种协议的分组延迟的相对影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
16 Mb/s token ring on unshielded twisted pair cabling Performance modelling of LAN bridges and routers An expert integrator for communication networks management Integrated Access to heterogeneous databases using forthcoming OSI standards Topological design of optically switched WDM networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1