Biological and Economic Efficiency of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Intercropped with Vegetable Amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.)

T. Seran, I. Brintha
{"title":"Biological and Economic Efficiency of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Intercropped with Vegetable Amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.)","authors":"T. Seran, I. Brintha","doi":"10.2174/1874840600902010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy farm, Eastern University, Sri Lanka to study the biological and economic efficiency of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) intercropped with vegetable amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.). Treatments were radish as sole crop (T1), vegetable amaranthus as sole crop (T2), 20/50 cm paired row radish with three (T3) or four (T4) rows of vegetable amaranthus in between paired rows and 25/40 cm paired row radish with three (T5) or two (T6) rows of vegetable amaranthus in between paired rows. The results showed that, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in area time equivalency ratio (ATER) among intercropping treatments and significant differences (P<0.05) were obtained in the land equivalent ratio (LER) and crop performance ratio (CPR). LER (1.31) and CPR (1.71) were superior in T3 and T4 respectively. In case of economic indices, gross return was significantly differed (P<0.01) among treatments. It was high in T3 followed by T4. Intercropping system recorded significantly high (P<0.01) cost of cultivation over intercropping system. Among intercropping, T4 resulted maximum net return, monetary equivalent ratio, cost benefit ratio and per day return over other intercropping treatments and sole crops. This experiment revealed that T4 would be the most efficient system in both biological and economical point of view.","PeriodicalId":166627,"journal":{"name":"The Open Horticulture Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Horticulture Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874840600902010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy farm, Eastern University, Sri Lanka to study the biological and economic efficiency of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) intercropped with vegetable amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.). Treatments were radish as sole crop (T1), vegetable amaranthus as sole crop (T2), 20/50 cm paired row radish with three (T3) or four (T4) rows of vegetable amaranthus in between paired rows and 25/40 cm paired row radish with three (T5) or two (T6) rows of vegetable amaranthus in between paired rows. The results showed that, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in area time equivalency ratio (ATER) among intercropping treatments and significant differences (P<0.05) were obtained in the land equivalent ratio (LER) and crop performance ratio (CPR). LER (1.31) and CPR (1.71) were superior in T3 and T4 respectively. In case of economic indices, gross return was significantly differed (P<0.01) among treatments. It was high in T3 followed by T4. Intercropping system recorded significantly high (P<0.01) cost of cultivation over intercropping system. Among intercropping, T4 resulted maximum net return, monetary equivalent ratio, cost benefit ratio and per day return over other intercropping treatments and sole crops. This experiment revealed that T4 would be the most efficient system in both biological and economical point of view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萝卜的生物学和经济效益间作蔬菜苋菜(Amaranthus tricolor L.)
在斯里兰卡东部大学农艺场进行了萝卜间作蔬菜苋菜的生物学和经济效益试验。处理方法为:萝卜作单茬作物(T1),蔬菜苋菜作单茬作物(T2), 20/50 cm成对行萝卜在成对行之间配3 (T3)或4 (T4)行蔬菜苋菜,25/40 cm成对行萝卜在成对行之间配3 (T5)或2 (T6)行蔬菜苋菜。结果表明,不同间作处理的面积时间等效比(ATER)差异不显著(P>0.05),土地等效比(LER)和作物绩效比(CPR)差异显著(P<0.05)。LER(1.31)和CPR(1.71)在T3和T4方面分别优于对照组。在经济指标方面,各处理间总收益差异极显著(P<0.01)。T3高,T4次之。间作的种植成本显著高于间作(P<0.01)。在间作中,T4的净收益、货币等值比、成本效益比和日收益均高于其他间作处理和单作。从生物学和经济的角度来看,T4都是最有效的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foliar Silicon and Titanium Applications Influence Growth and Quality Characteristics of Annual Bedding Plants Increased Antioxidant Activity, Despite Reduced Rosmarinic Acid Accumulation in Methanolic Extracts, of Spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) Plantlets Regenerated In Vitro Somatic Embryogenesis of Some Member Ornamental Genera of Amaryllidaceae and Allied Families: the Similarities and Differences Cultivar and Growing Location Effects on Fatty Acids, Minerals, and Sugars in Green Seeds of White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.) Differential Photosynthetic Efficiency and Pigment Content in Two Common Purslane (Portulaca oleracea) Biotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1