Enhancing ICJ Procedures in Order to Promote Fundamental Values

Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida
{"title":"Enhancing ICJ Procedures in Order to Promote Fundamental Values","authors":"Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846501.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By developing international law, international courts – ‘intermediate Global Public Goods (GPG)’ – can also contribute to the protection and promotion of final GPG. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in particular, is capable of promoting GPG by adjudicating inter-state claims. However, one of the main obstacles faced by the World Court relates to the existing tension between the bilateral nature of its own proceedings and the multilateral nature of the conflicting substantive law. Considering that procedure may guide and shape the application of substantive law, it will be argued that it should itself be interpreted and developed in a manner to ensure community interests. This chapter argues that the Court should assume expanded procedural powers in order to ensure the effective application of substantive law whenever GPG are at issue. Most procedural rules can be adjusted and tailored for multiparty aspects with the aim of protecting community interests and enhancing the international court’s legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":268388,"journal":{"name":"The Protection of General Interests in Contemporary International Law","volume":"2492 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Protection of General Interests in Contemporary International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846501.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By developing international law, international courts – ‘intermediate Global Public Goods (GPG)’ – can also contribute to the protection and promotion of final GPG. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in particular, is capable of promoting GPG by adjudicating inter-state claims. However, one of the main obstacles faced by the World Court relates to the existing tension between the bilateral nature of its own proceedings and the multilateral nature of the conflicting substantive law. Considering that procedure may guide and shape the application of substantive law, it will be argued that it should itself be interpreted and developed in a manner to ensure community interests. This chapter argues that the Court should assume expanded procedural powers in order to ensure the effective application of substantive law whenever GPG are at issue. Most procedural rules can be adjusted and tailored for multiparty aspects with the aim of protecting community interests and enhancing the international court’s legitimacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强国际法院程序以促进基本价值
通过发展国际法,国际法院——“中间全球公共产品(GPG)”——也可以为保护和促进最终的全球公共产品做出贡献。特别是国际法院(ICJ)能够通过裁决国家间的索赔来促进GPG。然而,世界法院面临的主要障碍之一是其本身诉讼程序的双边性质与相互冲突的实体法的多边性质之间存在的紧张关系。考虑到程序可以指导和影响实体法的适用,有人认为,对程序本身的解释和发展应确保社会利益。本章认为,法院应承担更大的程序权力,以确保在发生GPG问题时实体法的有效适用。大多数程序规则可以根据多方因素进行调整和调整,目的是保护社会利益和提高国际法院的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Multilevel Trade Governance Protect Global Public Goods without Constitutional Restraints? Disasters: An Additional (Legal) Dimension for the International Protection of Cultural Heritage Protecting the Atmosphere as a ‘Global Common Good’ The Global Commons and Common Interests: Is there Common Ground? Cultural Heritage as ‘Common Concern’: Role of International Organizations and States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1