Post-Colonialism Perspective: Why Turkey's Efforts to Join EU always 'Go Down in Flames'?

M. F. S. Rizqullah, Mahbi Maulaya
{"title":"Post-Colonialism Perspective: Why Turkey's Efforts to Join EU always 'Go Down in Flames'?","authors":"M. F. S. Rizqullah, Mahbi Maulaya","doi":"10.18196/jiwp.v5i1.8602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Union (EU) is an economically advanced, politically reliable, socially progressive, and regionally integrated community, making the so-called 'the role model of world's regionalism' seem adorable in Turkey's lens. Having the opportunity to wave its flag in Brussels has been Turkey's foreign policy since 1987. Turkey's modus operandi to make the EU opening its door are enormous in scale. Yet, it does not mean that Turkey would quickly receive a lukewarm response from the EU. This paper lays down some theoretical arguments based on post-colonialism to discover why the EU has given a persistent rejection and derogation towards Turkey. As this paper stands in a post-colonialism stance, the Euro-centrism sense, which is embedded in the EU's way of thought, serves as the reason why intentional rejection is intensively addressed towards Turkey. This paper contains several features. After delivering a short introduction, there will be a modest explanation in picturing the used-theoretical framework. The discussion section stands upon three main questions; why does the EU treat Turkey differently from Greece? Is Turkey capable of fulfilling Copenhagen criteria? Does the EU tend to act in a discriminative manner to Turkey?","PeriodicalId":113411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic World and Politics","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic World and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v5i1.8602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European Union (EU) is an economically advanced, politically reliable, socially progressive, and regionally integrated community, making the so-called 'the role model of world's regionalism' seem adorable in Turkey's lens. Having the opportunity to wave its flag in Brussels has been Turkey's foreign policy since 1987. Turkey's modus operandi to make the EU opening its door are enormous in scale. Yet, it does not mean that Turkey would quickly receive a lukewarm response from the EU. This paper lays down some theoretical arguments based on post-colonialism to discover why the EU has given a persistent rejection and derogation towards Turkey. As this paper stands in a post-colonialism stance, the Euro-centrism sense, which is embedded in the EU's way of thought, serves as the reason why intentional rejection is intensively addressed towards Turkey. This paper contains several features. After delivering a short introduction, there will be a modest explanation in picturing the used-theoretical framework. The discussion section stands upon three main questions; why does the EU treat Turkey differently from Greece? Is Turkey capable of fulfilling Copenhagen criteria? Does the EU tend to act in a discriminative manner to Turkey?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后殖民主义视角:土耳其加入欧盟为何总是“付诸东流”?
欧盟是一个经济发达、政治可靠、社会进步、地区一体化的共同体,在土耳其看来,所谓的“世界地区主义的榜样”显得很可爱。自1987年以来,有机会在布鲁塞尔挥舞自己的旗帜一直是土耳其的外交政策。土耳其让欧盟敞开大门的手法规模巨大。然而,这并不意味着土耳其会很快得到欧盟不冷不热的回应。本文从后殖民主义的角度出发,提出了一些理论论证,以揭示欧盟为何对土耳其给予了持续的排斥和贬损。由于本文站在后殖民主义的立场,欧盟思维方式中所蕴含的欧洲中心主义意识,是本文集中讨论有意拒绝土耳其的原因。本文有几个特点。在提供一个简短的介绍之后,将有一个适度的解释,以描绘使用的理论框架。讨论部分主要围绕三个问题展开;为什么欧盟对待土耳其和希腊的方式不同?土耳其有能力达到哥本哈根的标准吗?欧盟是否倾向于歧视土耳其?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Azerbaijan's Strategy to Win the Conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh Territory with Armenia in 2020 Critical Discourse Analysis of President Joe Biden’s Russophobia Rhetorical Remarks Before The 77th United Nations General Assembly China's Path towards Global Green Governance on Rare Earth Elements: Challenges and Opportunities Grain Corridor Agreement and Turkey’s Role in the Russia-Ukraine War Policy on Maritime Border Disputes Between Indonesia and Australia: Stephen M. Walt’s Neorealism Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1