Effects Of Intramuscular Administration Of Lidocaine In Hynotic Effect And On Induction And Maintenance Doses Of Propofol

K. Kahveci, Gözde Bumin Ayd n, D. Ornek, Hande Çelik, Cihan Do er, M.Naz m Elmasl, G. Özgün
{"title":"Effects Of Intramuscular Administration Of Lidocaine In Hynotic Effect And On Induction And Maintenance Doses Of Propofol","authors":"K. Kahveci, Gözde Bumin Ayd n, D. Ornek, Hande Çelik, Cihan Do er, M.Naz m Elmasl, G. Özgün","doi":"10.5580/1ee5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study we tested whether local anaesthetic administered i.m. potentiates the hypnotic effect of propofol. Methods. Sixty patients (two groups, n=30) undergoing lower abdominal surgery with total i.v. propofol anaesthesia were investigated. Patients in Group Lidocaine (Group L) received i.m. 100 mg and patients in Group Control (Group C) received i.m. saline 5 ml before the operation. Hypnosis was measured with responses to verbal commands. Results. In Group L, the time required for failure to open the eyes in response to verbal command, and the time and dose for achieving hypnosis were significantly shorter than Group C. The induction, and the maintenance doses of propofol were significantly less in Group L compared with the control group. Induction doses were 1.52 and 2.05 mg kg respectively; p<.0001. Maintenance doses were 7.28 and 9.93 mg kg respectively in the first hour; p<.0001. Conclusion. I.M. administered local anaesthetics are associated with a decrease in both the induction and maintenance doses of propofol during total i.v. anaesthesia and a reduction in haemodynamic responses.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1ee5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study we tested whether local anaesthetic administered i.m. potentiates the hypnotic effect of propofol. Methods. Sixty patients (two groups, n=30) undergoing lower abdominal surgery with total i.v. propofol anaesthesia were investigated. Patients in Group Lidocaine (Group L) received i.m. 100 mg and patients in Group Control (Group C) received i.m. saline 5 ml before the operation. Hypnosis was measured with responses to verbal commands. Results. In Group L, the time required for failure to open the eyes in response to verbal command, and the time and dose for achieving hypnosis were significantly shorter than Group C. The induction, and the maintenance doses of propofol were significantly less in Group L compared with the control group. Induction doses were 1.52 and 2.05 mg kg respectively; p<.0001. Maintenance doses were 7.28 and 9.93 mg kg respectively in the first hour; p<.0001. Conclusion. I.M. administered local anaesthetics are associated with a decrease in both the induction and maintenance doses of propofol during total i.v. anaesthesia and a reduction in haemodynamic responses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌注利多卡因对催眠效果及异丙酚诱导维持剂量的影响
背景。在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,我们测试了局部麻醉是否能增强异丙酚的催眠作用。方法。对60例下腹部手术全静脉注射异丙酚麻醉患者(两组,n=30)进行了研究。利多卡因组(L组)术前滴注100 mg,对照组(C组)术前滴注生理盐水5 ml。催眠是通过对口头命令的反应来衡量的。结果。L组在言语指令下睁眼失败的时间、实现催眠的时间和剂量均显著短于c组。L组异丙酚诱导和维持剂量均显著少于对照组。诱导剂量分别为1.52和2.05 mg kg;p <。。第1 h维持剂量分别为7.28和9.93 mg kg;p <。。结论。静脉注射局部麻醉与全静脉麻醉期间异丙酚诱导和维持剂量的减少以及血流动力学反应的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury With Laryngeal Mask Airway Unusual Oral Cavity Metastasis From Follicular Carcinoma Of The Thyroid – A Case Report Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Cesarean Section of a 25 3/7 Week Parturient with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A Case Report Magill Forceps- An Aid For Difficult Intubation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1