Labor Law Illiteracy: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME

Michael J. Yelnosky
{"title":"Labor Law Illiteracy: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME","authors":"Michael J. Yelnosky","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3243854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor law, both as an academic discipline and a subject of public consciousness, is in decline. The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Epic Systems v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME reflect a notable consequence of this decline – what I am calling labor law illiteracy. The majority in Epic Systems seems to misunderstand one of the basic principles of the National Labor Relations Act, and the majority in Janus based its decision, in part, on a simplistic and one-sided view of the justifications for public sector labor law and collective bargaining.","PeriodicalId":300536,"journal":{"name":"Roger Williams university law review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roger Williams university law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3243854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Labor law, both as an academic discipline and a subject of public consciousness, is in decline. The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Epic Systems v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME reflect a notable consequence of this decline – what I am calling labor law illiteracy. The majority in Epic Systems seems to misunderstand one of the basic principles of the National Labor Relations Act, and the majority in Janus based its decision, in part, on a simplistic and one-sided view of the justifications for public sector labor law and collective bargaining.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动法文盲:史诗系统公司诉刘易斯案和Janus诉AFSCME案
无论是作为一门学术学科,还是作为一门公众意识学科,劳动法都在走下坡路。最高法院最近对Epic Systems诉Lewis案和Janus诉AFSCME案的判决反映了这种衰落的显著后果——我称之为劳动法文盲。Epic Systems案的多数人似乎误解了《国家劳动关系法》的基本原则之一,而Janus案的多数人的决定,在一定程度上是基于对公共部门劳动法和集体谈判的理由的简单化和片面的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labor Law Illiteracy: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME Taking Justice Kennedy Seriously: Why Windsor Was Decided "quite apart from principles of federalism Comparative Law Methodology & American Legal Culture: Obstacles and Opportunities The Tenuous Case for Conscience Product-Related Risk and Cognitive Biases: The Shortcomings of Enterprise Liability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1