Performance Analysis of Topology and Destination Based Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Using NS2

A. A. Ajibesin, M. Kah, A. T. Ishaq, Caleb A. Ajibesin
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Topology and Destination Based Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Using NS2","authors":"A. A. Ajibesin, M. Kah, A. T. Ishaq, Caleb A. Ajibesin","doi":"10.1109/AICT47866.2019.8981772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, three MANET routing protocols were simulated. One is the DSDV which is a destination-based proactive protocol. Others are DSR and AODV which are topology-based reactive protocols. Also, three metrics namely, Throughput, Packet delivery ratio (PDR) and Jitter were considered for the performance evaluation. The protocols were simulated using network simulator 2. The results showed that the average Throughput, the PDR and average Jitter of the protocols increased as the number of network topology (nodes) increased. Overall, AODV protocol outperformed the other two protocols for all the observed metrics when the network exceeds 35 nodes while the DSR is the better protocol in smaller networks. Thus, the two reactive protocols (DSR Topology-based and AODV Destination-based) have shown better performance over the DSDV Destination-based proactive protocol. Furthermore, the trend analysis based on the cumulative performance in different network scenarios is useful information for the network designers.","PeriodicalId":329473,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT47866.2019.8981772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, three MANET routing protocols were simulated. One is the DSDV which is a destination-based proactive protocol. Others are DSR and AODV which are topology-based reactive protocols. Also, three metrics namely, Throughput, Packet delivery ratio (PDR) and Jitter were considered for the performance evaluation. The protocols were simulated using network simulator 2. The results showed that the average Throughput, the PDR and average Jitter of the protocols increased as the number of network topology (nodes) increased. Overall, AODV protocol outperformed the other two protocols for all the observed metrics when the network exceeds 35 nodes while the DSR is the better protocol in smaller networks. Thus, the two reactive protocols (DSR Topology-based and AODV Destination-based) have shown better performance over the DSDV Destination-based proactive protocol. Furthermore, the trend analysis based on the cumulative performance in different network scenarios is useful information for the network designers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于NS2的移动Ad-Hoc网络拓扑和目的地路由协议性能分析
本文对三种MANET路由协议进行了仿真。一个是DSDV,这是一个基于目的地的主动协议。其他的是DSR和AODV,它们是基于拓扑的反应性协议。此外,三个指标,即吞吐量,分组传输率(PDR)和抖动被认为是性能评估。使用网络模拟器2对协议进行了仿真。结果表明,各协议的平均吞吐量、PDR和平均抖动随网络拓扑(节点)数量的增加而增加。总的来说,当网络超过35个节点时,AODV协议在所有观察到的指标上都优于其他两个协议,而在较小的网络中,DSR是更好的协议。因此,两种响应式协议(基于DSR拓扑和基于AODV目的地)比基于DSDV目的地的主动协议表现出更好的性能。此外,基于不同网络场景下的累积性能的趋势分析对网络设计者来说是有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geometric fractal index as a tool of the time series analysis Facial Emotion Recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks Algorithm Diagnosis of Anemia on the basis of the Method of the Synthesis of the Decisive Rules How to Design Dialogue Scenarios and Estimate Main Dialogue Parameters for a Voice-Controlled Man-Machine Interface A Conceptual Model of an Intelligent Platform for Security Risk Assessment in SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1