Risk factors for death in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit

P. Prado, Natasha Varjão Volpáti, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Elisabeth Atila, L. Maggi, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral
{"title":"Risk factors for death in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit","authors":"P. Prado, Natasha Varjão Volpáti, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Elisabeth Atila, L. Maggi, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral","doi":"10.15253/3231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to determine the main risk factors for death in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit. Methods: it is a retrospective cohort study, wich included 126 patient chorts lhat had clinical and clinical and laboratory diagnosis of sepsis were considered eligible. The conditional probability of death was calculated through the Kaplan-Meier method and the risk of death was estimated by the hazard ratio, using a Cox regression model with p<0.050. Results: a total of 124 patients were included in the study. The main focus of infection was the respiratory system. Regarding the outcome, 40.3% patients with sepsis, 73.9% with severe sepsis and 69.2% with septic shock died. Patients with abdominal sepsis and using vasopressors were at higher risk of death. Conclusion: septic patients with abdominal source of infection and using vasopressor agents had a higher risk of dying, while patients who were tracheostomized had a better chance of living.","PeriodicalId":243005,"journal":{"name":"Northeast Network Nursing Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast Network Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/3231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: to determine the main risk factors for death in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit. Methods: it is a retrospective cohort study, wich included 126 patient chorts lhat had clinical and clinical and laboratory diagnosis of sepsis were considered eligible. The conditional probability of death was calculated through the Kaplan-Meier method and the risk of death was estimated by the hazard ratio, using a Cox regression model with p<0.050. Results: a total of 124 patients were included in the study. The main focus of infection was the respiratory system. Regarding the outcome, 40.3% patients with sepsis, 73.9% with severe sepsis and 69.2% with septic shock died. Patients with abdominal sepsis and using vasopressors were at higher risk of death. Conclusion: septic patients with abdominal source of infection and using vasopressor agents had a higher risk of dying, while patients who were tracheostomized had a better chance of living.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡的危险因素
目的:探讨重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡的主要危险因素。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入126例临床和临床及实验室诊断为败血症的患者。通过Kaplan-Meier法计算死亡条件概率,通过风险比估计死亡风险,采用p<0.050的Cox回归模型。结果:共纳入124例患者。感染的主要部位为呼吸系统。脓毒症死亡40.3%,严重脓毒症死亡73.9%,脓毒症休克死亡69.2%。腹部败血症和使用血管加压药物的患者死亡风险更高。结论:脓毒症患者腹部感染源合并使用血管加压药物死亡风险较高,气管造口术患者生存机会较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient guidance during discharge after a tracheostomy: an integrative review Building care gerontotechnologies in the context of elderly person with Alzheimer's disease Social representations attributed to prostate cancer by men undergoing follow-up at an in-hospital Oncology service Stigma perceived by mothers of children with congenital Zika virus syndrome The expert patient's contribution to the empowerment of people with diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1