Determining Culpability in Investigations of Malicious E-mail Dissemination within the Organisation

J. Haggerty, M. Taylor, D. Gresty
{"title":"Determining Culpability in Investigations of Malicious E-mail Dissemination within the Organisation","authors":"J. Haggerty, M. Taylor, D. Gresty","doi":"10.1109/WDFIA.2008.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating cases of e-mail misuse within an organization (e.g. sexist / racist content, offensive material, etc.) to determine culpability can be a complex process. Such investigations are less likely to result in a formal prosecution, but are more likely to end in disciplinary action. In a criminal investigation, the evidence is collected, analyzed and then presented to the court. In an internal corporate forensics investigation, management must not only assess evidence to determine culpability, but must also determine appropriate levels of corporate discipline to be applied. These range from informal verbal warnings through formal verbal and written warnings, to suspension or termination of employment. Such a process may often be conducted by management who have no experience of the investigatory process. The social network analysis approach presented in this paper can be used not only to analyze and appreciate what can be a complex sequence of events involved in e-mail misuse, but also to determine levels of culpability.","PeriodicalId":259636,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Annual Workshop on Digital Forensics and Incident Analysis","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Annual Workshop on Digital Forensics and Incident Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WDFIA.2008.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Investigating cases of e-mail misuse within an organization (e.g. sexist / racist content, offensive material, etc.) to determine culpability can be a complex process. Such investigations are less likely to result in a formal prosecution, but are more likely to end in disciplinary action. In a criminal investigation, the evidence is collected, analyzed and then presented to the court. In an internal corporate forensics investigation, management must not only assess evidence to determine culpability, but must also determine appropriate levels of corporate discipline to be applied. These range from informal verbal warnings through formal verbal and written warnings, to suspension or termination of employment. Such a process may often be conducted by management who have no experience of the investigatory process. The social network analysis approach presented in this paper can be used not only to analyze and appreciate what can be a complex sequence of events involved in e-mail misuse, but also to determine levels of culpability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在机构内调查恶意电子邮件传播的罪责确定
调查组织内部滥用电子邮件的案例(例如性别歧视/种族主义内容,攻击性材料等)以确定罪责可能是一个复杂的过程。这样的调查不太可能导致正式起诉,但更有可能以纪律处分告终。在刑事调查中,证据被收集、分析,然后呈交给法庭。在企业内部取证调查中,管理层不仅必须评估证据以确定罪责,还必须确定要应用的适当的企业纪律水平。这些措施的范围从非正式的口头警告到正式的口头和书面警告,到暂停或终止雇佣关系。这种程序通常由没有调查程序经验的管理人员进行。本文中提出的社会网络分析方法不仅可以用于分析和理解涉及电子邮件滥用的复杂事件序列,还可以用于确定罪责水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting and Manipulating Compressed Alternate Data Streams in a Forensics Investigation Two-Dimensional Evidence Reliability Amplification Process Model for Digital Forensics Cyber-Crime Investigations: Complex Collaborative Decision Making Forensic Value of Backscatter from Email Spam An Investigation into the Development of an Anti-forensic Tool to Obscure USB Flash Drive Device Information on a Windows XP Platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1