Assessing the maturity of knowledge management in medical universities: A cross-sectional study in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Soleiman Shafiee, Ardavan Hariri, Feizollah Foroghi
{"title":"Assessing the maturity of knowledge management in medical universities: A cross-sectional study in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","authors":"Soleiman Shafiee, Ardavan Hariri, Feizollah Foroghi","doi":"10.52547/jmis.7.4.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Knowledge is a strategic resource for developing services and gaining a competitive advantage, and timely evaluation of knowledge activities will be an important factor for organizational performance excellence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of management maturity and knowledge of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and its effect on performance excellence. Methods: The research method is a survey, and its type is applied. The study population included managers and staff of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. The research was conducted in 2021. Sampling was simple stratified random sampling. The sample size was 320 people. The data collection tool was the standard questionnaire of the Asian Productivity Organization (reliability coefficient of the questionnaire: 0.83). The questionnaire consisted of seven main criteria and 46 questions. The statistical software used was SPSS version 26. ANOVA, t-test, and simple linear regression analyzed the data and tested the hypotheses. Results : The research showed that the university was at the level of development of knowledge management maturity with a score of 141.16. The regression results showed that the knowledge processes index with a value of 0.69 had the highest effect, and the staff index with a value of 0.67 had the lowest effect on knowledge management maturity. The value of t-statistic was significant for indicators of knowledge maturity (technology, knowledge processes, leadership, process, learning and innovation, and knowledge management results) except employees at the level of less than 0.05. Conclusion : The results of data analysis proved the relationship between the Asian Productivity Organization knowledge management maturity model and performance improvement. Therefore, the mentioned model can be relied on, and the results can be generalized to the university.","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jmis.7.4.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Knowledge is a strategic resource for developing services and gaining a competitive advantage, and timely evaluation of knowledge activities will be an important factor for organizational performance excellence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of management maturity and knowledge of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and its effect on performance excellence. Methods: The research method is a survey, and its type is applied. The study population included managers and staff of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. The research was conducted in 2021. Sampling was simple stratified random sampling. The sample size was 320 people. The data collection tool was the standard questionnaire of the Asian Productivity Organization (reliability coefficient of the questionnaire: 0.83). The questionnaire consisted of seven main criteria and 46 questions. The statistical software used was SPSS version 26. ANOVA, t-test, and simple linear regression analyzed the data and tested the hypotheses. Results : The research showed that the university was at the level of development of knowledge management maturity with a score of 141.16. The regression results showed that the knowledge processes index with a value of 0.69 had the highest effect, and the staff index with a value of 0.67 had the lowest effect on knowledge management maturity. The value of t-statistic was significant for indicators of knowledge maturity (technology, knowledge processes, leadership, process, learning and innovation, and knowledge management results) except employees at the level of less than 0.05. Conclusion : The results of data analysis proved the relationship between the Asian Productivity Organization knowledge management maturity model and performance improvement. Therefore, the mentioned model can be relied on, and the results can be generalized to the university.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医科大学知识管理成熟度评估:克尔曼沙医科大学的横断面研究
目的:知识是企业发展服务和获得竞争优势的战略资源,对知识活动的及时评价将成为企业绩效卓越的重要因素。摘要本研究旨在评估克尔曼沙医科大学管理成熟度和知识水平及其对卓越绩效的影响。方法:研究方法为调查法,采用类型法。研究人群包括克尔曼沙阿医学院的管理人员和工作人员。该研究于2021年进行。抽样为简单分层随机抽样。样本量为320人。数据收集工具为亚洲生产力组织标准问卷(问卷信度系数:0.83)。问卷包括7项主要标准和46个问题。统计软件为SPSS 26。方差分析、t检验和简单线性回归分析了数据并检验了假设。结果:研究表明,学校处于知识管理成熟度发展水平,得分为141.16。回归结果表明,知识过程指数(0.69)对知识管理成熟度的影响最大,员工指数(0.67)对知识管理成熟度的影响最小。知识成熟度指标(技术、知识过程、领导力、过程、学习与创新、知识管理结果)除员工水平< 0.05外,其余各指标的t统计量均显著。结论:数据分析结果证明了亚洲生产力组织知识管理成熟度模型与绩效改善之间的关系。因此,该模型具有一定的可靠性,其结果可推广到高校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the factors affecting the satisfaction of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation updates 2020: a narrative review Design and implementation of tools for rapid assessment of the status of documentation of emergency department' physicians The acceptance model of e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic Investigating Barriers and Providing an Appropriate Model for Establishing Total Quality Management: A Case Study in Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1