Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?

Edmund L. Gettier
{"title":"Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?","authors":"Edmund L. Gettier","doi":"10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author.","PeriodicalId":104597,"journal":{"name":"Arguing About Knowledge","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1278","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arguing About Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1278

Abstract

Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正确的信仰是知识吗?
埃德蒙·盖蒂埃是马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校的名誉教授。这篇发表于1963年的短文,在许多人看来,似乎果断地驳斥了另一种对知识的分析,这种分析本来是很有吸引力的。它激发了一种新的努力,这种努力仍在继续,即澄清知识究竟由什么组成。____________________来自分析。第23卷[966]。埃德蒙·盖提尔版权所有。经作者许可转载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism is Not Relativism 1 Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons* Meditation One The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification "Appear," "Take," and "Evident"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1