What’s Wrong with Me? What’s Wrong with You? The Issue of Over-Diagnosing ADHD in Children

Tyler Redublo
{"title":"What’s Wrong with Me? What’s Wrong with You? The Issue of Over-Diagnosing ADHD in Children","authors":"Tyler Redublo","doi":"10.15173/sciential.v1i1.1914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, the field of mental health has been shrouded in controversy and conflict. The problems associated with diagnosing mental illnesses are still prevalent today, and this process becomes even more complicated when assessing children, who have yet to develop mature social skills and cognitive functioning. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the mental health conditions that is diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Overwhelming support from the primary literature suggests that the current procedures of diagnosing ADHD- which begin during childhood- allow for a high degree of subjectivity, inconsistency, and uncertainty. For these reasons, the issue of over-diagnosing ADHD in children has become more significant, and more plausible than ever before. By outlining the key factors that contribute to this problem, certain modifications can be made to improve the ADHD diagnostic procedures for future applications. These changes can increase the accuracy of mental health assessments, thus minimizing the number of false positive diagnoses of ADHD in children worldwide.","PeriodicalId":262888,"journal":{"name":"Sciential - McMaster Undergraduate Science Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sciential - McMaster Undergraduate Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/sciential.v1i1.1914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, the field of mental health has been shrouded in controversy and conflict. The problems associated with diagnosing mental illnesses are still prevalent today, and this process becomes even more complicated when assessing children, who have yet to develop mature social skills and cognitive functioning. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the mental health conditions that is diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Overwhelming support from the primary literature suggests that the current procedures of diagnosing ADHD- which begin during childhood- allow for a high degree of subjectivity, inconsistency, and uncertainty. For these reasons, the issue of over-diagnosing ADHD in children has become more significant, and more plausible than ever before. By outlining the key factors that contribute to this problem, certain modifications can be made to improve the ADHD diagnostic procedures for future applications. These changes can increase the accuracy of mental health assessments, thus minimizing the number of false positive diagnoses of ADHD in children worldwide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我怎么了?你怎么了?儿童多动症的过度诊断问题
从历史上看,心理健康领域一直笼罩在争议和冲突中。与诊断精神疾病相关的问题在今天仍然普遍存在,在评估尚未发展成熟的社交技能和认知功能的儿童时,这一过程变得更加复杂。注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是使用精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)诊断的一种精神健康状况。来自主要文献的压倒性支持表明,目前诊断ADHD的程序——从儿童时期开始——允许高度的主观性、不一致性和不确定性。由于这些原因,过度诊断儿童多动症的问题变得比以往任何时候都更加重要和可信。通过概述导致这一问题的关键因素,可以做出某些修改,以改进ADHD的诊断程序,以供将来应用。这些变化可以提高心理健康评估的准确性,从而最大限度地减少全球儿童ADHD假阳性诊断的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between β-blockers and Mental Health Blue Wavelength Light Treatment for Improving Sleep in Patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks of Testosterone Replacement Therapy Efficacy of Scalp Cooling in the Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia Among Breast Cancer Patients Sciential Issue 10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1