THE ROLE, POSITION, AND FUNCTIONS OF VERBAL WITNESSES AS EVIDENCE IN PROVING CRIMINAL CASES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (KUHAP)

Fox Justi, T. Tatang, Sekolah Tinggi, Ilmu Hukum, D. Politik, Pelopor Bangsa
{"title":"THE ROLE, POSITION, AND FUNCTIONS OF VERBAL WITNESSES AS EVIDENCE IN PROVING CRIMINAL CASES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (KUHAP)","authors":"Fox Justi, T. Tatang, Sekolah Tinggi, Ilmu Hukum, D. Politik, Pelopor Bangsa","doi":"10.58471/justi.v12i1.471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A criminal case is the act of a person who has violated the provisions of material criminal law, both those stipulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and those regulated outside the Criminal Code. The evidence is the central point in the examination of cases in court. This is because through this stage of evidence there is a process, method, act of proving to show whether the defendant is right or wrong in a criminal case in court. However, as time goes by the practice of criminal justice in Indonesia, it is often the case that the testimony of witnesses in front of the trial differs from the information that witnesses give at the investigation stage, which is contained in the minutes of witness examination. If there is a difference in information like this, then the information before the court takes precedence. If the priority is the information in the Witness's BAP, then all of the accusations of the public prosecutor are proven automatically. If something like this happens, then the thing that can be done is to summon the investigating officer who made the BAP to be examined in front of the trial called a verbal witness. The research specification used is descriptive analytical, which provides data or a description as accurately as possible about the object of the problem, while the approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that, The role of verbal witnesses as evidence in proving criminal cases associated with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is very important, because it is useful for finding answers regarding the defendant who revoked the Examination Report (BAP) who admitted that he was tortured, forced or he felt trapped by the police during the investigation process, the Judge or the Public Prosecutor presented the Verbalisan Witness to find answers or refutation of what was stated by the defendant..","PeriodicalId":351142,"journal":{"name":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v12i1.471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A criminal case is the act of a person who has violated the provisions of material criminal law, both those stipulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and those regulated outside the Criminal Code. The evidence is the central point in the examination of cases in court. This is because through this stage of evidence there is a process, method, act of proving to show whether the defendant is right or wrong in a criminal case in court. However, as time goes by the practice of criminal justice in Indonesia, it is often the case that the testimony of witnesses in front of the trial differs from the information that witnesses give at the investigation stage, which is contained in the minutes of witness examination. If there is a difference in information like this, then the information before the court takes precedence. If the priority is the information in the Witness's BAP, then all of the accusations of the public prosecutor are proven automatically. If something like this happens, then the thing that can be done is to summon the investigating officer who made the BAP to be examined in front of the trial called a verbal witness. The research specification used is descriptive analytical, which provides data or a description as accurately as possible about the object of the problem, while the approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that, The role of verbal witnesses as evidence in proving criminal cases associated with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is very important, because it is useful for finding answers regarding the defendant who revoked the Examination Report (BAP) who admitted that he was tortured, forced or he felt trapped by the police during the investigation process, the Judge or the Public Prosecutor presented the Verbalisan Witness to find answers or refutation of what was stated by the defendant..
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口头证人在与刑事诉讼法相关的刑事案件中作为证据的作用、地位和功能
刑事案件是违反《刑法》和《刑法》以外规定的《物质刑法》规定的人的行为。证据是法庭审查案件的中心问题。这是因为通过这一阶段的证据,有一个过程、方法、行为来证明法庭上刑事案件中被告是对还是错。然而,随着印度尼西亚刑事司法实践的时间推移,经常出现证人在审判前的证词与证人在调查阶段提供的资料不同的情况,这些资料载于证人审查的记录中。如果这样的信息存在差异,那么法庭上的信息优先。如果优先考虑证人BAP中的信息,那么公诉人的所有指控都将自动得到证明。如果发生了这样的事情,那么可以做的事情就是传唤制作BAP的调查人员在审判前接受审查,称为口头证人。使用的研究规范是描述性分析,它尽可能准确地提供有关问题对象的数据或描述,而本研究中使用的方法是规范性司法方法。研究结果表明:“在刑事诉讼法相关的刑事案件中,口头证人作为证据的作用非常重要,因为对于在调查过程中承认受到酷刑、强迫或被警察诱捕的撤销考试报告(BAP)的被告人来说,口头证人的作用非常重要。”法官或公诉人出示口头证人,以寻找对被告陈述的答案或反驳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Parties In The Indonesian Political System After The Rolling Of Reforms JURIDICAL REVIEW ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING CRIMINAL ACTS (Decision Number : 801/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Lbp) SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL DISPUTES BETWEEN CUSTOMERS WITH BANK THROUGH BANKING MEDIATION (Case Study of Bank Al Washliyah Medan) REVIEW OF COVID-19 TASK CIRCULAR LETTER NUMBER 20 YEAR 2021 ON MANDATORY QUARANTINE POLICY AFTER TAKING INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE (STUDY ON TRAVEL HUB HOTEL) JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DECIDING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CLASS 1 ARCOTIC ABUSE FOR YOURSELF (CASE STUDY Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Lbp PN LUBUK PAKAM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1