About the Poetics of Sergey Rafalsky

{"title":"About the Poetics of Sergey Rafalsky","authors":"","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2022-60-4-5-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article the author proves that the habit of researching the poetry by Sergey Rafalsky in the traditions of the Prague group «Skete of Poets» needs revising, because the poet emphasized his disagreements with the creative practice of that group and its leader A. Bem repeatedly. The author identifies some features, that indicate how the artistic credo of the «Paris note» influenced the poetics by Rafalsky, and notices the specificity, that allows us to speak about Rafalsky’s succession to G. Ivanov and G. Adamovich. The author analyses the poems, in which Rafalsky demonstrates implicitly his solidarity with the criteria \nof the genuine poetry in G. Adamovich’s comprehension and attempts to reconstruct intonations of conversational natural speech as adequately as possible, with its fragmentariness, understatement and incomplete information. All these \nfeatures were intrinsic to the poets of the «Paris note». The author proves that the poems of Rafalsky’s late period ought to be analysed in the context of the creative quests of the poets of Russian Montparnasse, although the influence of the avantgarde poetics is still strong in them. One of the reasons of such esemblance is an intonation dominant of the poetry of Rafalsky, who makes the most of Lermontov's and Blok's legacy in this aspect. Both of these poets were the gold standard for \nthe poets of the «Paris note», as well as G. Ivanov","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2022-60-4-5-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article the author proves that the habit of researching the poetry by Sergey Rafalsky in the traditions of the Prague group «Skete of Poets» needs revising, because the poet emphasized his disagreements with the creative practice of that group and its leader A. Bem repeatedly. The author identifies some features, that indicate how the artistic credo of the «Paris note» influenced the poetics by Rafalsky, and notices the specificity, that allows us to speak about Rafalsky’s succession to G. Ivanov and G. Adamovich. The author analyses the poems, in which Rafalsky demonstrates implicitly his solidarity with the criteria of the genuine poetry in G. Adamovich’s comprehension and attempts to reconstruct intonations of conversational natural speech as adequately as possible, with its fragmentariness, understatement and incomplete information. All these features were intrinsic to the poets of the «Paris note». The author proves that the poems of Rafalsky’s late period ought to be analysed in the context of the creative quests of the poets of Russian Montparnasse, although the influence of the avantgarde poetics is still strong in them. One of the reasons of such esemblance is an intonation dominant of the poetry of Rafalsky, who makes the most of Lermontov's and Blok's legacy in this aspect. Both of these poets were the gold standard for the poets of the «Paris note», as well as G. Ivanov
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论谢尔盖·拉法尔斯基的诗学
在本文中,作者证明了谢尔盖·拉法尔斯基(Sergey Rafalsky)在布拉格“诗人之家”(Skete of Poets)团体的传统中研究诗歌的习惯需要修正,因为这位诗人一再强调他对该团体及其领导人A. Bem的创作实践持不同意见。作者确定了一些特征,表明“巴黎笔记”的艺术信条如何影响拉法尔斯基的诗学,并注意到特殊性,这使我们能够谈论拉法尔斯基对G.伊万诺夫和G.阿达莫维奇的继承。作者分析了这些诗歌,在这些诗歌中,拉法尔斯基含蓄地表明了他与阿达莫维奇理解的真正诗歌标准的一致,并试图尽可能充分地重建会话自然语言的语调,其片段性,轻描淡写和不完整的信息。所有这些特征都是“巴黎笔记”的诗人所固有的。作者认为,拉法尔斯基晚期诗歌虽然受到先锋派诗学的影响,但仍应放在俄国蒙帕纳斯派诗人创作追求的背景中加以分析。这种相似的原因之一是拉法尔斯基诗歌的语调占主导地位,他充分利用了莱蒙托夫和布洛克在这方面的遗产。这两位诗人都是“巴黎笔记”诗人的黄金标准,以及G.伊万诺夫
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anglo-Russian Military Cooperation in the Year of 1799: Based on the Materials from the «Journal of the Dutch Expedition» by I. Fiodorov The Defender of the Orthodoxy or the Pious Catholic? St. Sophia of Slutsk in the Narratives of 19th – early 20th Centuries Formation of the Legal Basis for Social Security of Disabled People of the Great Patriotic War in the BSSR (1940−1950s) Semantic Modeling of Ways to Verbalize Emotions in the Political Discourse of Germany Regensburg Convention of Electors 1636/1637 and Brandenburg's Struggle for Imperial Peace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1