Effect of pit and plastic bag methods and some additives on chemical composition of grass-legume mixture silages

J. G. Rafaat
{"title":"Effect of pit and plastic bag methods and some additives on chemical composition of grass-legume mixture silages","authors":"J. G. Rafaat","doi":"10.36077/kjas/2022/140102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted at the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, the experimental field of the University of Sulaimani, during the growing season of 2012 – 2013. The experiment used two methods of making silage (pit method and plastic/ bag method) by making 18 pits with 100×80×100 cm, and 18 plasticbags sized 22 litter. Each silos contained three different forage types: grasses include whole barley and oat; alfalfa as legume and mixture. Those material were treated with two additives of sugar and molasses;solutions at a rate of 1:10; additives were used to improve silage preservation.The factorial design with a complete randomized block design (CRBD) experiment with three replications were used to analysis this study.Themostimportantresults indicatedthat the highest carbohydrates, ash, crude fat, crude fiber and moisture contents of 15.299, 8.580, 2.966, 18.399, and 70.536 % respectively, were achieved by using plastic bags method. The result showed that the highest carbohydrate content of 16.623% was achieved by using plastic methodwith grasses. However, the highest crude protein content of 22.037% was achieved by using pits with plant mixture and sugar. The highest pH value of 5.527 was recorded by the interaction among pits, plant mixture, and molasses. The highest dry matter content of 36.65% of was recorded by the interaction among plastic, grasses and sugar.The maximum carbohydrates content of 15.693% was achieved by using grasses, while legumes gave the highest contents of ash, crude fat, crude protein and dry matter. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the method of using plastic bags was significant than pits method, the pits method with a mixture of (grasses and legumes) withmolasses produced maximum crude fiber, moisture, crude fat, and dry matter contents.","PeriodicalId":254783,"journal":{"name":"Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36077/kjas/2022/140102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted at the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, the experimental field of the University of Sulaimani, during the growing season of 2012 – 2013. The experiment used two methods of making silage (pit method and plastic/ bag method) by making 18 pits with 100×80×100 cm, and 18 plasticbags sized 22 litter. Each silos contained three different forage types: grasses include whole barley and oat; alfalfa as legume and mixture. Those material were treated with two additives of sugar and molasses;solutions at a rate of 1:10; additives were used to improve silage preservation.The factorial design with a complete randomized block design (CRBD) experiment with three replications were used to analysis this study.Themostimportantresults indicatedthat the highest carbohydrates, ash, crude fat, crude fiber and moisture contents of 15.299, 8.580, 2.966, 18.399, and 70.536 % respectively, were achieved by using plastic bags method. The result showed that the highest carbohydrate content of 16.623% was achieved by using plastic methodwith grasses. However, the highest crude protein content of 22.037% was achieved by using pits with plant mixture and sugar. The highest pH value of 5.527 was recorded by the interaction among pits, plant mixture, and molasses. The highest dry matter content of 36.65% of was recorded by the interaction among plastic, grasses and sugar.The maximum carbohydrates content of 15.693% was achieved by using grasses, while legumes gave the highest contents of ash, crude fat, crude protein and dry matter. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the method of using plastic bags was significant than pits method, the pits method with a mixture of (grasses and legumes) withmolasses produced maximum crude fiber, moisture, crude fat, and dry matter contents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坑法、塑料袋法及添加剂对草-豆科混合青贮化学成分的影响
本研究于2012 - 2013年生长季节在苏莱曼尼大学的实验田农业工程科学学院进行。试验采用坑法和胶袋法两种青贮方式,挖18个坑,直径100×80×100 cm, 18个塑料袋,大小22窝。每个筒仓都有三种不同的饲料类型:牧草包括全大麦和燕麦;苜蓿作为豆科植物和混合物。这些材料用糖和糖蜜两种添加剂处理,溶液的比例为1:10;添加添加剂可提高青贮的保鲜度。本研究采用全随机区组设计(CRBD)试验,共3个重复。结果表明,采用塑料袋处理的玉米碳水化合物、灰分、粗脂肪、粗纤维和水分含量最高,分别为15.299、8.580、2.966、18.399和70.536%。结果表明,采用草料塑法可获得最高的碳水化合物含量,达16.623%。而以植物混合料和糖处理,粗蛋白质含量最高,达22.037%。果核、植物混合物和糖蜜相互作用的pH值最高,为5.527。干物质含量最高的是塑料、草和糖的互作,达36.65%。碳水化合物含量以禾草最高,为15.693%,灰分、粗脂肪、粗蛋白质和干物质含量以豆科植物最高。从本研究的结果可以看出,使用塑料袋的方法比坑法显著,坑法与糖蜜混合(草和豆类)产生最大的粗纤维、水分、粗脂肪和干物质含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First record of three Endophytic fungi isolated from xerophyte plants in Basra, Iraq Identification study of Vicia faba genotypes based on seed properties and mineral content Effect of using different levels of egg shell as calcium sources in broiler diet on growth performance, blood parameters, and bone characteristics Synthesis Chitosan nanoparticles from Animal Byproducts (Shrimp Shells) Characterization, Physical Properties and Toxicity of Polymeric Nanoparticles in vivo Environmental behavior assessment Thiophanate methyl in the soil using different mathematical models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1