An Emerging Trend - ADR Mechanism in IPR Conflicts

Sanjeev Chaswal
{"title":"An Emerging Trend - ADR Mechanism in IPR Conflicts","authors":"Sanjeev Chaswal","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3401259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India is country habitants having many religion and cultures, since centuries habitants of India has evolved with several forms of dispute resolution mechanisms and over period of time, they have customized, varied according to needs. Even though Britisher’s rulers had left Indian shores almost half a century ago, still several of these laws exist till date without any major changes. Wide Internet usage has rendered boundaries of the states meaningless. The people across the globe have realized its potentiality as an effective tool for communication, dissemination of information and e-commerce and enjoying to unrestricted access to multifarious interactions, transactions inevitably thereby raising many new issues in the nature of e-disputes to virtual sale/purchase of products through e-auctions or otherwise, domain disputes, trademark infringement, patents, software infringement, copyright, defamatory writings, fraud, privacy, etc. \n \nIn this scenario the Intellectual Property Rights are becoming fundamentally exigent to get in to research collaborations and thereby making Intellectual property rights tool as valuable business assets for technological entities. The people across world over frequently involve in cross-border transactions having different backgrounds and different national laws or within different states of India. Some time disputable transactions create multi-jurisdictional disputes between the nationalities of different countries having different social backgrounds, mindsets. Usually those business entities having familiarity with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are able to resolve such conflicts efficiently. As the determination of commercial or non commercial disputes before different national courts can result in to high legal and other costs as well as conflicting awards. Therefore, the ADR has a potential to provide business entities belonging to distinct nationalities a single unified forum of arbitration thereby having a final and enforceable award binding across multiple jurisdictions. Hence, increasingly, IP owners and users are approaching to many of known alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures like arbitration and mediation to resolve their IP disputes. \n \nIn this scenario the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has been playing pivotal role since i ts inception in strengthening ADR procedures for IP conflicts and forefront in resolving IP conflicts through their specialized ADR procedures. The Intellectual Property conflicts are not that conflicts which cannot be adjudicated or resolved through ADR. As Intellectual Property conflicts being a specialised in its nature and it require specialised services of ADR experts in resolving IP conflicts, mainly due to non availability of IP experts in India is the main obstacle in resolving IP conflict through arbitration or through ADR. \n \nThus, like any other emerging field of law, IP conflict resolution also has a plenty of debatable issues before it. In this research paper, It will be my endeavor to delve deep into these issues like amongst mainly i) Whether ADR: arbitration and mediation can be real alternative to IP disputes litigation, ii ) whether IP right disputes like any other commercial disputes can be brought under ADR procedure or not If so, to what extent?. iii) When is ADR to be preferred, when is it to be avoided; and, if ADR is preferred, what form of ADR should be pursued? iv) Whether, an alternative dispute resolution procedure can play effective role in resolving IP conflicts if so to what extent? v) Whether the parties to IP conflicts can reap overall benefits by invoking ADR procedures in comparison to traditional litigation, if so, to what extent? vi) Whether the use of a private consensual mechanism like arbitration or mediation procedures pose any threat to the resolution of such specialised disputes, if so, to what extent?","PeriodicalId":237857,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Other Intellectual Property Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Other Intellectual Property Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3401259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India is country habitants having many religion and cultures, since centuries habitants of India has evolved with several forms of dispute resolution mechanisms and over period of time, they have customized, varied according to needs. Even though Britisher’s rulers had left Indian shores almost half a century ago, still several of these laws exist till date without any major changes. Wide Internet usage has rendered boundaries of the states meaningless. The people across the globe have realized its potentiality as an effective tool for communication, dissemination of information and e-commerce and enjoying to unrestricted access to multifarious interactions, transactions inevitably thereby raising many new issues in the nature of e-disputes to virtual sale/purchase of products through e-auctions or otherwise, domain disputes, trademark infringement, patents, software infringement, copyright, defamatory writings, fraud, privacy, etc. In this scenario the Intellectual Property Rights are becoming fundamentally exigent to get in to research collaborations and thereby making Intellectual property rights tool as valuable business assets for technological entities. The people across world over frequently involve in cross-border transactions having different backgrounds and different national laws or within different states of India. Some time disputable transactions create multi-jurisdictional disputes between the nationalities of different countries having different social backgrounds, mindsets. Usually those business entities having familiarity with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are able to resolve such conflicts efficiently. As the determination of commercial or non commercial disputes before different national courts can result in to high legal and other costs as well as conflicting awards. Therefore, the ADR has a potential to provide business entities belonging to distinct nationalities a single unified forum of arbitration thereby having a final and enforceable award binding across multiple jurisdictions. Hence, increasingly, IP owners and users are approaching to many of known alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures like arbitration and mediation to resolve their IP disputes. In this scenario the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has been playing pivotal role since i ts inception in strengthening ADR procedures for IP conflicts and forefront in resolving IP conflicts through their specialized ADR procedures. The Intellectual Property conflicts are not that conflicts which cannot be adjudicated or resolved through ADR. As Intellectual Property conflicts being a specialised in its nature and it require specialised services of ADR experts in resolving IP conflicts, mainly due to non availability of IP experts in India is the main obstacle in resolving IP conflict through arbitration or through ADR. Thus, like any other emerging field of law, IP conflict resolution also has a plenty of debatable issues before it. In this research paper, It will be my endeavor to delve deep into these issues like amongst mainly i) Whether ADR: arbitration and mediation can be real alternative to IP disputes litigation, ii ) whether IP right disputes like any other commercial disputes can be brought under ADR procedure or not If so, to what extent?. iii) When is ADR to be preferred, when is it to be avoided; and, if ADR is preferred, what form of ADR should be pursued? iv) Whether, an alternative dispute resolution procedure can play effective role in resolving IP conflicts if so to what extent? v) Whether the parties to IP conflicts can reap overall benefits by invoking ADR procedures in comparison to traditional litigation, if so, to what extent? vi) Whether the use of a private consensual mechanism like arbitration or mediation procedures pose any threat to the resolution of such specialised disputes, if so, to what extent?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识产权纠纷中的ADR机制
印度是一个拥有许多宗教和文化的国家,几个世纪以来,印度的居民已经演变出几种形式的争端解决机制,随着时间的推移,他们已经根据需要进行了定制和变化。尽管英国统治者在近半个世纪前离开了印度海岸,但其中一些法律至今仍存在,没有任何重大变化。互联网的广泛使用使得各州的边界变得毫无意义。世界各地的人们已经意识到它作为沟通、信息传播和电子商务的有效工具的潜力,并享有不受限制的各种互动和交易,从而不可避免地提出了许多新的问题,即电子纠纷,通过电子拍卖或其他方式虚拟销售/购买产品,域名纠纷,商标侵权,专利,软件侵权,版权,诽谤作品,欺诈,隐私等。在这种情况下,知识产权正变得从根本上迫切需要进入研究合作,从而使知识产权工具成为技术实体的宝贵商业资产。世界各地的人们经常涉及具有不同背景和不同国家法律或印度不同州的跨境交易。有时,争议性交易在具有不同社会背景和思维方式的不同国家的民族之间产生多管辖权纠纷。通常那些熟悉替代性争议解决(ADR)的业务实体能够有效地解决此类冲突。由于在不同的国家法院对商事或非商事纠纷的裁决可能导致高昂的法律和其他费用以及相互冲突的裁决。因此,ADR有可能为属于不同国籍的商业实体提供一个统一的仲裁论坛,从而拥有一个跨多个司法管辖区具有约束力的最终和可执行的裁决。因此,知识产权所有者和用户越来越多地采用许多已知的替代性争议解决(ADR)程序,如仲裁和调解,来解决他们的知识产权纠纷。在这种情况下,世界知识产权组织(WIPO)自成立以来一直在加强知识产权冲突的ADR程序方面发挥关键作用,并在通过其专门的ADR程序解决知识产权冲突方面走在前列。知识产权冲突不是不能通过ADR裁决或解决的冲突。由于知识产权冲突本质上是专业化的,它需要ADR专家的专业服务来解决知识产权冲突,主要是由于印度没有知识产权专家,这是通过仲裁或ADR解决知识产权冲突的主要障碍。因此,像任何其他新兴的法律领域一样,知识产权冲突解决也有许多值得商辩的问题。在这篇论文中,我将努力深入研究这些问题,主要包括:1)ADR:仲裁和调解是否可以成为知识产权纠纷诉讼的真正替代方案;2)知识产权纠纷是否可以像其他商业纠纷一样进入ADR程序?iii)什么时候应优先考虑ADR,什么时候应避免ADR;如果首选ADR,应采取何种形式的ADR ?iv)替代性争议解决程序是否能够有效地解决知识产权冲突?如果能够,在多大程度上能够发挥作用?v)与传统诉讼相比,知识产权冲突各方是否可以通过援引ADR程序获得总体利益,如果可以,在多大程度上?(六)采用仲裁或调解程序等私人协商一致的机制,是否会对解决这类专门争端构成威胁?如果会,威胁的程度如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Printing of Spare Parts Via IP License Contracts Intellectual Property, Independent Creation, and the Lockean Commons What Do America's First Patents Have to Do with Today's? Porter Analysis: A Business Strategy of Amazon.com Through a Value Chain and Comparative Advantage Analysis of Amazon's Trademarks and Intangibles Open Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1