On the Lost Purpose of Transition

Igor Lukšić
{"title":"On the Lost Purpose of Transition","authors":"Igor Lukšić","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2756398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After quarter of a century, it is not a waste of time to reassess the effects of the transition process. Have we missed the purpose? The transition can be given scrutiny via different models, but also through the integration process which runs danger of falling into the pit of the constructivism. The transition was (or should have been) about moving from a hampered into an unhampered market society in the first place. It is obvious that we are far from there. That is why some international financial organisations such as IMF or EBRD seem to be changing their focus. Probably logically so, but the true question is whether the process and the policymaking is about letting an individual make decisions freely, or about reconstructing paternalism in different forms. The recent economic crisis does not help either. Reducing corruption and increasing transparency along with long haul education reforms that spur entrepreneurial spirit in order to make political and market reforms sustainable, may be a quest to seek the lost purpose of transition.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

After quarter of a century, it is not a waste of time to reassess the effects of the transition process. Have we missed the purpose? The transition can be given scrutiny via different models, but also through the integration process which runs danger of falling into the pit of the constructivism. The transition was (or should have been) about moving from a hampered into an unhampered market society in the first place. It is obvious that we are far from there. That is why some international financial organisations such as IMF or EBRD seem to be changing their focus. Probably logically so, but the true question is whether the process and the policymaking is about letting an individual make decisions freely, or about reconstructing paternalism in different forms. The recent economic crisis does not help either. Reducing corruption and increasing transparency along with long haul education reforms that spur entrepreneurial spirit in order to make political and market reforms sustainable, may be a quest to seek the lost purpose of transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论转型的迷失目的
经过四分之一个世纪,重新评估过渡进程的影响并不是浪费时间。我们是否错过了目的?这种转变可以通过不同的模型来审视,但也可以通过整合过程来审视,这有落入建构主义陷阱的危险。这种转变首先是(或者应该是)从一个受阻碍的市场社会过渡到一个不受阻碍的市场社会。很明显,我们离那还很远。这就是为什么IMF或欧洲复兴开发银行(EBRD)等一些国际金融机构似乎正在改变它们的关注点。逻辑上可能是这样,但真正的问题是,这个过程和政策制定是让个人自由决策,还是以不同的形式重建家长式作风。最近的经济危机也于事无补。减少腐败和提高透明度,同时进行长期的教育改革,以激发企业家精神,使政治和市场改革具有可持续性,这可能是寻求转型失去的目标的一种探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of an Adjusted Relative Strength Index Model in the Foreign Currency and Energy Markets of Emerging and Developed Economies Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law A Financial Macro-Network Approach to Climate Policy Evaluation Cooperatives As Hybrid Approach to Pull Off Sustainable Development and Livelihoods: An Analytical Review The National Credit Act’s Remedies for Reckless Credit in the Mortgage Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1