Raptor versus Reed Solomon forward error correction codes

U. Demir, Özlem Aktaş
{"title":"Raptor versus Reed Solomon forward error correction codes","authors":"U. Demir, Özlem Aktaş","doi":"10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network conditions generally cause errors on network packets. Correction of these errors is in the subject of \"forward error correction.\" Forward error correction is divided into two categories: bit-level forward error correction and packet-level forward error correction. These two categories are unfamiliar. The aim of this study is to make a literature comparison of two alternative packet-level forward error correction codes: Raptor and Reed Solomon. Nowadays when packet-level error correction codes are mentioned, these two techniques are remembered. Reed Solomon FEC codes are found on the Internet and are tested with different network conditions. Raptor codes are commercial and not used broadly yet. But several new technologies (MBMS, DVB and etc.) uses Raptor. This study shows the cases, where Raptor and Reed Solomon are appropriate to use","PeriodicalId":304528,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Network conditions generally cause errors on network packets. Correction of these errors is in the subject of "forward error correction." Forward error correction is divided into two categories: bit-level forward error correction and packet-level forward error correction. These two categories are unfamiliar. The aim of this study is to make a literature comparison of two alternative packet-level forward error correction codes: Raptor and Reed Solomon. Nowadays when packet-level error correction codes are mentioned, these two techniques are remembered. Reed Solomon FEC codes are found on the Internet and are tested with different network conditions. Raptor codes are commercial and not used broadly yet. But several new technologies (MBMS, DVB and etc.) uses Raptor. This study shows the cases, where Raptor and Reed Solomon are appropriate to use
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猛禽对里德·所罗门的纠错码
网络状况通常会导致网络报文出现错误。这些错误的纠正是在“前向纠错”的主题。前向纠错分为位级前向纠错和包级前向纠错两类。这两个类别是不熟悉的。本研究的目的是使两个替代包级前向纠错码的文献比较:猛禽和里德所罗门。现在,当提到包级纠错码时,就会想到这两种技术。里德所罗门FEC代码在互联网上找到,并在不同的网络条件下进行了测试。猛禽代码是商业的,还没有广泛使用。但一些新技术(MBMS, DVB等)使用猛禽。本研究展示了Raptor和Reed Solomon适合使用的情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and implementation of two-level VPN service provisioning systems over MPLS networks Migration Scenarios for Metro Networks A migration roadmap for metro access networks Performance analysis of an efficient packet-based IEEE 802.16 MAC supporting adaptive modulation and coding SeCond: a system for epidemic peer-to-peer content distribution Competition-based load balancing for distributed systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1