Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India

Arpita Singh
{"title":"Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India","authors":"Arpita Singh","doi":"10.59126/v2i4a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is a tool used to improve the relationship between creditors and debtors and to serve as a creditor recovery law. The code is also beneficial legislation that assists corporate debtors in regaining their financial footing. However, numerous writ petitions and Special Leave Petitions challenging the constitutional legality of the various provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 were filed before the Supreme Court of India. The primary objective of the legislation is to protect the corporate debtor from its own management and from liquidation in order to ensure the debtor's recovery and continued existence. Therefore, the corporate debtor's interests have been separated from those of the promoters and management. In this case, Swiss Ribbons Private Limited and other companies filed a petition and argued that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is unconstitutional for the specified reasons. The petitioners asserted that Article 14 of the Indian Constitution had been violated because Sections 7, 12A, 29A, and 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code failed the test of constitutionality. The verdict, which was delivered on January 25, 2019, addressed each of the petitioners' arguments and provided a comprehensive justification for the law, which is now acknowledged as its sole basis.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v2i4a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is a tool used to improve the relationship between creditors and debtors and to serve as a creditor recovery law. The code is also beneficial legislation that assists corporate debtors in regaining their financial footing. However, numerous writ petitions and Special Leave Petitions challenging the constitutional legality of the various provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 were filed before the Supreme Court of India. The primary objective of the legislation is to protect the corporate debtor from its own management and from liquidation in order to ensure the debtor's recovery and continued existence. Therefore, the corporate debtor's interests have been separated from those of the promoters and management. In this case, Swiss Ribbons Private Limited and other companies filed a petition and argued that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is unconstitutional for the specified reasons. The petitioners asserted that Article 14 of the Indian Constitution had been violated because Sections 7, 12A, 29A, and 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code failed the test of constitutionality. The verdict, which was delivered on January 25, 2019, addressed each of the petitioners' arguments and provided a comprehensive justification for the law, which is now acknowledged as its sole basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士丝带私人有限公司诉印度联邦
《2016年破产和破产法》是一项用于改善债权人和债务人之间关系并作为债权人追偿法的工具。该法典也是一项有益的立法,有助于公司债务人恢复其财务基础。然而,印度最高法院收到了大量质疑2016年《破产法》(IBC)各项条款的宪法合法性的书面请愿书和特别许可请愿书。立法的主要目的是保护公司债务人不受其自身管理和清算的影响,以确保债务人的恢复和继续存在。因此,公司债务人的利益已经与发起人和管理层的利益相分离。在本案中,Swiss Ribbons Private Limited和其他公司提交了一份请愿书,认为《2016年破产与破产法》因特定原因违宪。请愿人声称,由于《破产和破产法》第7、12A、29A和53节未能通过合宪性检验,因此违反了《印度宪法》第14条。2019年1月25日作出的判决解决了请愿人的每一个论点,并为该法律提供了全面的理由,该法律现在被认为是其唯一依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND IMPLICATIONS ON MODERN ISSUES JUDICIAL REVIEW: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING ITS APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE: EXPLORING DECENTRALIZED DEMOCRACY DATA PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: THE INTERSECTION OF PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1