Rapid Antigen Detection Test Using Rates of Family Physicians, Test Results and Its Impact on Their Prescription Behaviours

Humeyra Aslaner, H. Aslaner, Bade Ertürk Arik, F. A. Onuk, A. Benli, S. Mıstık
{"title":"Rapid Antigen Detection Test Using Rates of Family Physicians, Test Results and Its Impact on Their Prescription Behaviours","authors":"Humeyra Aslaner, H. Aslaner, Bade Ertürk Arik, F. A. Onuk, A. Benli, S. Mıstık","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2020090405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the rates of rapid antigen detection test use, test results and its relationship with Modified Centor Score and investigate the effect of rapid antigen detection test use on prescribing behaviour.\n\nMethods: This research was conducted by scanning the family physicians’ information system retrospectively. From the Family Medicine Information System, where polyclinics and prescription records of the family health centers where 12 family physicians work in Kayseri are located, the number and results of rapid antigen detection tests performed between February 2017 and April 2019, the Modified Centor Score automatically calculated by the system, the number of prescribed antibiotics and symptomatic treatment information was recorded.\n\nResults: The positivity of rapid antigen detection test was considered, cut-off value of Modified Centor Score was >2 (ROC EAA:63.9, Cl:0.95,0.61-0.66). Sensitivity rate of the test for diagnostic score was 86% and selectivity rate was 48.8%.\n\nConclusion: Family physicians should be encouraged to use rapid antigen detection test. The fact that antibiotics are prescribed in rapid antigen detection testnegative patients may indicate that confidence level of the test is less than physical examination and clinical findings.\n\nKeywords: sore throat, primary care, score","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2020090405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the rates of rapid antigen detection test use, test results and its relationship with Modified Centor Score and investigate the effect of rapid antigen detection test use on prescribing behaviour. Methods: This research was conducted by scanning the family physicians’ information system retrospectively. From the Family Medicine Information System, where polyclinics and prescription records of the family health centers where 12 family physicians work in Kayseri are located, the number and results of rapid antigen detection tests performed between February 2017 and April 2019, the Modified Centor Score automatically calculated by the system, the number of prescribed antibiotics and symptomatic treatment information was recorded. Results: The positivity of rapid antigen detection test was considered, cut-off value of Modified Centor Score was >2 (ROC EAA:63.9, Cl:0.95,0.61-0.66). Sensitivity rate of the test for diagnostic score was 86% and selectivity rate was 48.8%. Conclusion: Family physicians should be encouraged to use rapid antigen detection test. The fact that antibiotics are prescribed in rapid antigen detection testnegative patients may indicate that confidence level of the test is less than physical examination and clinical findings. Keywords: sore throat, primary care, score
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭医生快速抗原检测试验使用率、检测结果及其对处方行为的影响
目的:了解快速抗原检测的使用率、检测结果及其与修正中心评分的关系,探讨快速抗原检测对处方行为的影响。方法:通过对家庭医生信息系统的回顾性扫描进行研究。从家庭医学信息系统(其中有12名家庭医生在开塞利工作的家庭保健中心的综合诊所和处方记录)中,记录了2017年2月至2019年4月期间进行的快速抗原检测试验的次数和结果、系统自动计算的修正中心评分、处方抗生素的数量和对症治疗信息。结果:考虑快速抗原检测试验阳性,修正中心评分(Modified Centor Score)临界值为bb0.2 (ROC EAA:63.9, Cl:0.95,0.61 ~ 0.66)。诊断评分的敏感性为86%,选择性为48.8%。结论:应鼓励家庭医生采用快速抗原检测方法。在快速抗原检测试验阴性的患者中开抗生素的事实可能表明该试验的置信度低于体格检查和临床结果。关键词:喉咙痛,初级保健,评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Three Methods, “Pap Smear, Conization and LEEP” in Women with Abnormal Pap Smear: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analytical Study Evaluation of Misbeliefs, Myths and Knowledge About Nevi and Skin Cancer in Dermatology Patients Breastfeeding Problems of Mothers in the Postpartum Period and Impact on Sleep Quality The Relationship of Pain Sensitivity and Severity with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain The Relationship Between Parents’ Health Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1