The effects of physicians’ communication satisfaction and their perceptions of empowerment on their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peers

Thomas Loughman, R. Snipes, Jennifer P. Pitts
{"title":"The effects of physicians’ communication satisfaction and their perceptions of empowerment on their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peers","authors":"Thomas Loughman, R. Snipes, Jennifer P. Pitts","doi":"10.1108/01409170910944308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine factors that may contribute to physicians’ dissatisfaction with their work environment, and subsequently, their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peers.Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method research design was used to identify, through qualitative interviews and focus groups, and measure, through quantitative surveys, physicians’ satisfaction with organizational communication, perceptions of empowerment and their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peer physicians.Findings – The results of the study indicate that physicians’ communication satisfaction and perceptions of empowerment contribute both directly and indirectly to their likelihood to recommend their organization to peers. The findings suggest that hospitals that facilitate positive workplace communications and provide work environments that allow professional discretion and autonomy are more likely to have satisfied physicians and positive word‐of‐mouth referrals.Research...","PeriodicalId":325346,"journal":{"name":"Management Research News","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910944308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine factors that may contribute to physicians’ dissatisfaction with their work environment, and subsequently, their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peers.Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method research design was used to identify, through qualitative interviews and focus groups, and measure, through quantitative surveys, physicians’ satisfaction with organizational communication, perceptions of empowerment and their likelihood to recommend a hospital to their peer physicians.Findings – The results of the study indicate that physicians’ communication satisfaction and perceptions of empowerment contribute both directly and indirectly to their likelihood to recommend their organization to peers. The findings suggest that hospitals that facilitate positive workplace communications and provide work environments that allow professional discretion and autonomy are more likely to have satisfied physicians and positive word‐of‐mouth referrals.Research...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生沟通满意度和授权感知对其向同行推荐医院的可能性的影响
目的-本文的目的是研究可能导致医生对其工作环境不满的因素,以及随后他们向同行推荐医院的可能性。设计/方法/方法-采用混合方法研究设计,通过定性访谈和焦点小组,并通过定量调查,确定医生对组织沟通的满意度,授权的看法和他们向同行医生推荐医院的可能性。研究结果-研究结果表明,医生的沟通满意度和授权感知直接或间接地促进了他们向同行推荐组织的可能性。研究结果表明,促进积极的工作场所沟通并提供允许专业裁量权和自主权的工作环境的医院更有可能获得满意的医生和积极的口碑转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of Professionalism as an Issue in British Marketing The Quality of Working Life, Robotics and the Professional Engineer Escalation of Commitment in Groups and the Moderating Effects of Information Framing An exploratory RFID patent analysis Extending the intellectual bandwidth model: a case study from the bioscience industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1