The MPG Survey: Questioning the Biased Perception of Automobile Fuel Economy

Q. B. Dam
{"title":"The MPG Survey: Questioning the Biased Perception of Automobile Fuel Economy","authors":"Q. B. Dam","doi":"10.1109/ENERGY.2008.4781016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a survey about the perception of achievable automobile fuel economies versus EPA ratings. The survey follows up of a driving experiment in which the fuel consumed was 30% lower than the rated consumption for the same distance. On one hand, the results of the survey suggest that for most people, the perception of the possible fuel economy of a particular car seems to be biased by its advertised fuel economy and present standards. On the other hand, the driving experiment confirms that fuel consumption is affected by the driving style of motorists. As a result, this paper constitutes a call to all drivers to be more optimistic about and take some responsibility for the fuel efficiency of their automobiles. Fuel economies that exceed the EPA ratings are easily obtained with a few driving adjustments. In the present energy and environment turmoil, such adjustments result in immediate and significant savings in terms of fuel, carbon footprint, and environmental impacts.","PeriodicalId":240093,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENERGY.2008.4781016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper presents a survey about the perception of achievable automobile fuel economies versus EPA ratings. The survey follows up of a driving experiment in which the fuel consumed was 30% lower than the rated consumption for the same distance. On one hand, the results of the survey suggest that for most people, the perception of the possible fuel economy of a particular car seems to be biased by its advertised fuel economy and present standards. On the other hand, the driving experiment confirms that fuel consumption is affected by the driving style of motorists. As a result, this paper constitutes a call to all drivers to be more optimistic about and take some responsibility for the fuel efficiency of their automobiles. Fuel economies that exceed the EPA ratings are easily obtained with a few driving adjustments. In the present energy and environment turmoil, such adjustments result in immediate and significant savings in terms of fuel, carbon footprint, and environmental impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MPG调查:质疑对汽车燃油经济性的偏见
本文提出了一项关于可实现的汽车燃油经济性与EPA评级的看法的调查。这项调查是在一个驾驶实验之后进行的,在这个实验中,燃油消耗量比相同距离的额定消耗量低30%。一方面,调查结果表明,对大多数人来说,对一辆特定汽车可能的燃油经济性的看法似乎受到其宣传的燃油经济性和现行标准的偏见。另一方面,驾驶实验证实了油耗受到驾驶者驾驶方式的影响。因此,本文呼吁所有司机对他们汽车的燃油效率更加乐观,并承担一些责任。超过EPA评级的燃油经济性很容易通过一些驾驶调整获得。在当前能源和环境动荡的情况下,这种调整可以在燃料、碳足迹和环境影响方面立即产生显著的节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Framework for Evaluation of Energy Policy Proposals Network reliability assessment towards long term planning AC Grid with Embedded VSC-HVDC for Secure and Efficient Power Delivery Control Strategies for Battery/Supercapacitor Hybrid Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics, a Key Technology for Energy Efficiency and Renewables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1