Thinking about thinking

Deborah Graham
{"title":"Thinking about thinking","authors":"Deborah Graham","doi":"10.5040/9781350284906.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Extract) Unless we stop and think about thinking, critical thinking can be elusive. \n \nThinking about thinking is a form of metacognition. It requires effortful understanding of the thinking process and an ability to exert control over it. \n \nWhen we think we often use heuristics, or a rule of thumb, to guide our conclusions. This of course means that there is no guarantee that our conclusions are correct. Conclusions may be drawn on the basis of impressions. These cognitive shortcuts allow for rapid processing of information, but they can also mislead and be inaccurate. Stereotypes are another example of classification according to salient features rather than factual elements. \n \nBefore these are discussed in more detail, a quick look at comprehension and evaluation is worthwhile. Comprehension can be taken for granted or people can be put off thinking about what is being said by jargon-heavy or disciplinespecific language. It is easy, though, to unpack information and identify exactly what is being communicated. This unpacking will ultimately result in a far better ability to evaluate information. Although this may seem selfevident, unless we are thinking about what we are thinking, and why we are thinking about an issue in a certain way, we may fall into effortless thinking that can lead to false conclusions.","PeriodicalId":390628,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Thinking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Thinking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350284906.ch-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Extract) Unless we stop and think about thinking, critical thinking can be elusive. Thinking about thinking is a form of metacognition. It requires effortful understanding of the thinking process and an ability to exert control over it. When we think we often use heuristics, or a rule of thumb, to guide our conclusions. This of course means that there is no guarantee that our conclusions are correct. Conclusions may be drawn on the basis of impressions. These cognitive shortcuts allow for rapid processing of information, but they can also mislead and be inaccurate. Stereotypes are another example of classification according to salient features rather than factual elements. Before these are discussed in more detail, a quick look at comprehension and evaluation is worthwhile. Comprehension can be taken for granted or people can be put off thinking about what is being said by jargon-heavy or disciplinespecific language. It is easy, though, to unpack information and identify exactly what is being communicated. This unpacking will ultimately result in a far better ability to evaluate information. Although this may seem selfevident, unless we are thinking about what we are thinking, and why we are thinking about an issue in a certain way, we may fall into effortless thinking that can lead to false conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思考思考
[节选]除非我们停下来思考思考,否则批判性思维是难以捉摸的。关于思考的思考是元认知的一种形式。它需要努力理解思维过程,并有能力控制它。当我们思考时,我们经常使用启发式或经验法则来指导我们的结论。这当然意味着不能保证我们的结论是正确的。可以根据印象得出结论。这些认知捷径允许快速处理信息,但它们也可能误导和不准确。刻板印象是根据显著特征而不是事实要素进行分类的另一个例子。在更详细地讨论这些之前,有必要快速查看一下理解和评估。理解可能被认为是理所当然的,或者人们可能会被大量的行话或特定学科的语言所阻碍。然而,要解开信息并准确地确定所传达的内容是很容易的。这种分解最终将导致更好的评估信息的能力。虽然这似乎是不言自明的,但除非我们思考我们在想什么,以及我们为什么以某种方式思考一个问题,否则我们可能会陷入轻松的思考,从而得出错误的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thinking about thinking Philosophy in schools Philosophy for Children Stories for thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1