Side effects of botanical insecticides on predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni (Chant)

M. Castagnoli , G. Angeli , M. Liguori , D. Forti , S. Simoni
{"title":"Side effects of botanical insecticides on predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni (Chant)","authors":"M. \n Castagnoli\n \n ,&nbsp;G. \n Angeli\n \n ,&nbsp;M. \n Liguori\n \n ,&nbsp;D. \n Forti\n \n ,&nbsp;S. \n Simoni","doi":"10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02035.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effects of the botanical insecticides Biopiren plus, Piresan plus and Neemazal T/S on the predatory mite <i>Amblyseius andersoni</i> (Chant) were tested under laboratory, semi-field, and field conditions. The tests carried out in the laboratory allowed detection of the direct toxicity on eggs and females as well as the effects on fecundity, whereas semi-field trials assessed their residual toxicity. In laboratory and semi-field tests, pyrethrins, particularly Piresan plus, proved to have the highest toxicity with <i>E</i> value, concerning both female mortality and fecundity, of 100 % and 45 %, respectively. The same product tested in the field only caused a significant reduction in the phytoseiid population shortly after the treatment. The relevant escape rate registered in semi-field tests could explain the lack of phytoseiid eradication in the field after treatment with pyrethrins.</p>","PeriodicalId":100103,"journal":{"name":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02035.x","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02035.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The effects of the botanical insecticides Biopiren plus, Piresan plus and Neemazal T/S on the predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) were tested under laboratory, semi-field, and field conditions. The tests carried out in the laboratory allowed detection of the direct toxicity on eggs and females as well as the effects on fecundity, whereas semi-field trials assessed their residual toxicity. In laboratory and semi-field tests, pyrethrins, particularly Piresan plus, proved to have the highest toxicity with E value, concerning both female mortality and fecundity, of 100 % and 45 %, respectively. The same product tested in the field only caused a significant reduction in the phytoseiid population shortly after the treatment. The relevant escape rate registered in semi-field tests could explain the lack of phytoseiid eradication in the field after treatment with pyrethrins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性杀虫剂对安德氏钝绥螨的毒副作用
在室内、半田间和田间条件下,研究了植物性杀虫剂bibiiren +、Piresan +和Neemazal T/S对安德氏弱螨(Amblyseius andersoni)的杀灭效果。在实验室进行的试验可检测对卵和雌虫的直接毒性以及对繁殖力的影响,而半实地试验则评估其残留毒性。在实验室和半现场试验中,除虫菊酯,特别是比雷桑加剂,证明具有最高的毒性,在雌性死亡率和繁殖力方面的E值分别为100%和45%。在田间测试的相同产品在处理后不久只引起了类植物蜂群的显著减少。在半田间试验中记录的相关逃逸率可以解释使用除虫菊酯后在田间没有根除植物蚜虫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Untersuchungen zur überlebensfähigkeit und Entwicklung der Larven zweier Herkünfte des Schwammspinners Lymantria dispar L. (Lep.: Lymantriidae) in Abhängigkeit von der Fraßpflanze* Studies on the suitability of trap-tubs to control noxious rodents in forests Studies on the parasitoids of Gelechia senticetella (Stgr.) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Bulgaria Biologischer Pflanzenschutz Reproductive potential of the parasitic wasp Microplitis rufiventris Kok. (Hym.: Braconidae), reared in hosts treated with chitin synthesis inhibitors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1