Selecting creativity techniques for creative requirements: An evaluation of four techniques using creativity workshops

Richard Berntsson-Svensson, Maryam Taghavianfar
{"title":"Selecting creativity techniques for creative requirements: An evaluation of four techniques using creativity workshops","authors":"Richard Berntsson-Svensson, Maryam Taghavianfar","doi":"10.1109/RE.2015.7320409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements engineering is recognized as a creative process where stakeholders jointly discover new creative ideas for innovative and novel products that eventually are expressed as requirements. This paper evaluates four different creativity techniques, namely Hall of Fame, Constraint Removal, Brainstorming, and Idea Box, using creativity workshops with students and industry practitioners. In total, 34 creativity workshops were conducted with 90 students from two universities, and 86 industrial practitioners from six companies. The results from this study indicate that Brainstorming can generate by far the most ideas, while Hall of Fame generates most creative ideas. Idea Box generates the least number of ideas, and the least number of creative ideas. Finally, Hall of Fame was the technique that led to the most number of requirements that was included in future releases of the products.","PeriodicalId":132568,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Requirements engineering is recognized as a creative process where stakeholders jointly discover new creative ideas for innovative and novel products that eventually are expressed as requirements. This paper evaluates four different creativity techniques, namely Hall of Fame, Constraint Removal, Brainstorming, and Idea Box, using creativity workshops with students and industry practitioners. In total, 34 creativity workshops were conducted with 90 students from two universities, and 86 industrial practitioners from six companies. The results from this study indicate that Brainstorming can generate by far the most ideas, while Hall of Fame generates most creative ideas. Idea Box generates the least number of ideas, and the least number of creative ideas. Finally, Hall of Fame was the technique that led to the most number of requirements that was included in future releases of the products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为创意需求选择创意技术:利用创意工作坊对四种创意技术进行评估
需求工程被认为是一个创造性的过程,在这个过程中,涉众共同为创新的和新颖的产品发现新的创造性的想法,这些想法最终被表达为需求。本文评估了四种不同的创造力技术,即名人堂,约束去除,头脑风暴和创意盒,使用与学生和行业从业者的创造力研讨会。来自两所大学的90名学生和来自六家公司的86名业界人士共举办了34个创意工作坊。这项研究的结果表明,到目前为止,头脑风暴能产生最多的想法,而名人堂能产生最多的创意。“创意盒”产生的创意最少,创意最少。最后,Hall of Fame是一种技术,它导致了大量的需求,这些需求被包含在产品的未来版本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Personal Information Security Assistant Can you intentionally design a product that is Cool? (keynote) Change impact analysis for Natural Language requirements: An NLP approach Assessment of risk perception in security requirements composition Using real options to manage Technical Debt in Requirements Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1