A Deeper Look at Gender Difference in Multitasking: Gender-Specific Mechanism of Cognitive Control

Dongning Ren, Haotian Zhou, Xiaolan Fu
{"title":"A Deeper Look at Gender Difference in Multitasking: Gender-Specific Mechanism of Cognitive Control","authors":"Dongning Ren, Haotian Zhou, Xiaolan Fu","doi":"10.1109/ICNC.2009.542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion that women are better at multitasking has already become part of our folk knowledge that has been widely accepted. However, scientific community surprisingly falls silent on this issue. The present research attempted to evaluate this idea critically using strictly controlled lab experiment. We found that men’s performance in a commonly adopted cognitive test deteriorated when they were required to coordinate this primary test with a simple secondary test. In sharp contrast, women’s performance on the very same test improved upon the inclusion of the secondary test. This surprising gender-specific pattern is suggestive of the involvement of cognitive control in the playing out of the putative gender discrepancy in multitasking. Though the present study does not speak directly to whether women do possess superior multitasking ability over men, the empirical data presented here is in alignment with the evolutionary speculation about this gender gap derived from the Hunter-Gatherer Hypothesis and point to a new venue for further research on this issue.","PeriodicalId":235382,"journal":{"name":"2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNC.2009.542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

The notion that women are better at multitasking has already become part of our folk knowledge that has been widely accepted. However, scientific community surprisingly falls silent on this issue. The present research attempted to evaluate this idea critically using strictly controlled lab experiment. We found that men’s performance in a commonly adopted cognitive test deteriorated when they were required to coordinate this primary test with a simple secondary test. In sharp contrast, women’s performance on the very same test improved upon the inclusion of the secondary test. This surprising gender-specific pattern is suggestive of the involvement of cognitive control in the playing out of the putative gender discrepancy in multitasking. Though the present study does not speak directly to whether women do possess superior multitasking ability over men, the empirical data presented here is in alignment with the evolutionary speculation about this gender gap derived from the Hunter-Gatherer Hypothesis and point to a new venue for further research on this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多任务处理的性别差异:认知控制的性别机制
女性更擅长多任务处理的观念已经成为我们民间知识的一部分,并被广泛接受。然而,令人惊讶的是,科学界对这个问题保持沉默。本研究试图通过严格控制的实验室实验来批判性地评价这一观点。我们发现,当男性被要求将这个主要测试与一个简单的次要测试相协调时,他们在一个普遍采用的认知测试中的表现会恶化。与此形成鲜明对比的是,女性在同一项测试中的表现在加入第二项测试后有所提高。这种令人惊讶的性别差异模式暗示了认知控制参与了多任务处理中假定的性别差异的发挥。虽然目前的研究并没有直接说明女性是否比男性拥有更强的多任务处理能力,但这里提出的经验数据与从狩猎采集者假说中衍生出来的关于这种性别差距的进化推测是一致的,并为进一步研究这一问题指明了一个新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Minimum Abandoned Water Optimization Model of Reservoir and Its Application A New Image Denoising Method via Self-Organizing Feature Map Based on Hidden Markov Models Adaptive Genetic Algorithm and its Application to the Structural Optimization of Steel Tower A New Multistage Chaos Synchronized System for Secure Communications Application of MEC-Based Fuzzy Control in Boiler of Sludge Combustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1