Technical Comparison Aspects of Leading Blockchain-Based Platforms on Key Characteristics

A. Ivanov, Yevhenii Babichenko, Hlib Kanunnikov, Paul Karpus, Leonid Foiu­-Khatskevych, Roman Kravchenko, Kyrylo Gorokhovskyi, Ievhen Nevmerzhitskyi
{"title":"Technical Comparison Aspects of Leading Blockchain-Based Platforms on Key Characteristics","authors":"A. Ivanov, Yevhenii Babichenko, Hlib Kanunnikov, Paul Karpus, Leonid Foiu­-Khatskevych, Roman Kravchenko, Kyrylo Gorokhovskyi, Ievhen Nevmerzhitskyi","doi":"10.18523/2617-3808.2018.58-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain as a technology is rapidly developing, finding more and more new entry points into everyday life. This is one of the elements of the technical Revolution 4.0, and it is used in the field of supply, maintenance of various types of registers, access to software products, combating DDOS attacks, distributed storage, fundraising for projects, IoT, etc. Nowadays, there are many blockchain­platforms in the world. They have one technological root but different applications. There are many prerequisites to the fact that in the future the number of new decentralized applications will increase. Therefore, it is important to develop a methodology for determining the optimal blockchain­based platform to solve a specific problem. As an example, consider the world­famous platforms Ethereum, Nem, and Stellar. Each of them allows to develop decentralized applications, issue tokens, and execute transactions. At the same time, the key features of these blockchain­based platforms are not similar to one another. These very features will be considered in the article. Purpose. Identify the key parameters that characterize the blockchain­based platforms. This will provide an opportunity to present a complex blockchain technology in the form of a simple and understandable architecture. Based on these parameters and using the expertise of the article’s authors, we will be able to develop a methodology to be used to solve the problems of choosing the optimal blockchain­based platform for solving the problem of developing smart contracts and issuing tokens. Methods. Analysis of the complexity of using blockchain­based platforms. Implementation of token issuance, use of test and public networks, execution of transactions, analysis of the development team and the community, analysis of the user interface and the developer interface. Discussion. By developing a platform comparison methodology to determine optimal characteristics, we can take the development process to a new level. This will allow to quickly and effectively solve the tasks. Results. Creation of a methodology for comparison blockchain­based platforms.","PeriodicalId":433538,"journal":{"name":"NaUKMA Research Papers. Computer Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NaUKMA Research Papers. Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-3808.2018.58-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Blockchain as a technology is rapidly developing, finding more and more new entry points into everyday life. This is one of the elements of the technical Revolution 4.0, and it is used in the field of supply, maintenance of various types of registers, access to software products, combating DDOS attacks, distributed storage, fundraising for projects, IoT, etc. Nowadays, there are many blockchain­platforms in the world. They have one technological root but different applications. There are many prerequisites to the fact that in the future the number of new decentralized applications will increase. Therefore, it is important to develop a methodology for determining the optimal blockchain­based platform to solve a specific problem. As an example, consider the world­famous platforms Ethereum, Nem, and Stellar. Each of them allows to develop decentralized applications, issue tokens, and execute transactions. At the same time, the key features of these blockchain­based platforms are not similar to one another. These very features will be considered in the article. Purpose. Identify the key parameters that characterize the blockchain­based platforms. This will provide an opportunity to present a complex blockchain technology in the form of a simple and understandable architecture. Based on these parameters and using the expertise of the article’s authors, we will be able to develop a methodology to be used to solve the problems of choosing the optimal blockchain­based platform for solving the problem of developing smart contracts and issuing tokens. Methods. Analysis of the complexity of using blockchain­based platforms. Implementation of token issuance, use of test and public networks, execution of transactions, analysis of the development team and the community, analysis of the user interface and the developer interface. Discussion. By developing a platform comparison methodology to determine optimal characteristics, we can take the development process to a new level. This will allow to quickly and effectively solve the tasks. Results. Creation of a methodology for comparison blockchain­based platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主要区块链平台关键特性的技术比较方面
区块链作为一项技术正在迅速发展,在日常生活中找到越来越多的新切入点。这是技术革命4.0的要素之一,它用于供应领域,维护各种类型的登记册,访问软件产品,打击DDOS攻击,分布式存储,项目筹款,物联网等。如今,世界上有很多区块链平台。它们有着相同的技术根源,但有着不同的应用。在未来,新的去中心化应用程序的数量将会增加,这是有很多先决条件的。因此,开发一种方法来确定基于区块链的最佳平台来解决特定问题非常重要。以世界著名的以太坊、Nem和Stellar平台为例。它们中的每一个都允许开发分散的应用程序、发行令牌和执行事务。与此同时,这些基于区块链的平台的关键功能彼此并不相似。本文将讨论这些特性。目的。确定表征基于区块链平台的关键参数。这将为以简单易懂的体系结构的形式呈现复杂的区块链技术提供机会。基于这些参数并利用本文作者的专业知识,我们将能够开发一种方法,用于解决选择最佳基于区块链的平台的问题,以解决开发智能合约和发行代币的问题。方法。分析使用区块链平台的复杂性。代币发行的实现,测试和公共网络的使用,交易的执行,开发团队和社区的分析,用户界面和开发人员界面的分析。讨论。通过开发一种平台比较方法来确定最佳特性,我们可以将开发过程提升到一个新的水平。这将允许快速有效地解决任务。结果。创建一种基于区块链的平台比较方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bicycle Protection System Using GPS/GSM Modules аnd Radio Protocol Parking Spot Occupancy Classification Using Deep Learning Information System Assessment of the Creditworthiness of an Individual Transdisciplinary Information and Analytical Platform Supporting Evaluation Processes Two-Stage Transportation Problem with Unknown Consumer Demands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1