Classification of special investigative measures

Vitalie Jitariuc
{"title":"Classification of special investigative measures","authors":"Vitalie Jitariuc","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues relating to the classification of special investigative measures are of substantial importance to the theory and practice of special investigative work. The specialized literature records certain attempts regarding the arrangement of special investigative measures by categories and groups based on different grounds, but, in total, the issues related to the classification of special investigative measures have been insufficiently studied in the theory of special investigative activity, from which consideration they follow to be subjected to substantial scientific research. Likewise, the operative-investigative doctrine does not highlight a certain opinion regarding the classification of special investigative measures. This happens because the special investigative measures have an extremely diversified character, they are varied, as a result of which each specialist in the field comes up with his own classification, trying to justify it based on his own experience and knowledge that he considers relevant. The process of perfecting the notions and concepts specific to the special investigative activity must be based on logical operations, procedures and interpretations. They are of major importance for solving several questions and for carrying out various tasks of the science of special investigative activity and, first of all, for the materialization of its basic categories, to which the classification of special investigative measures is attributed. The circumstances in question determined the necessity and actuality of conducting a complex study of the classification of special investigative measures based on the analysis, interpretation and systematization of doctrinal opinions on this subject.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issues relating to the classification of special investigative measures are of substantial importance to the theory and practice of special investigative work. The specialized literature records certain attempts regarding the arrangement of special investigative measures by categories and groups based on different grounds, but, in total, the issues related to the classification of special investigative measures have been insufficiently studied in the theory of special investigative activity, from which consideration they follow to be subjected to substantial scientific research. Likewise, the operative-investigative doctrine does not highlight a certain opinion regarding the classification of special investigative measures. This happens because the special investigative measures have an extremely diversified character, they are varied, as a result of which each specialist in the field comes up with his own classification, trying to justify it based on his own experience and knowledge that he considers relevant. The process of perfecting the notions and concepts specific to the special investigative activity must be based on logical operations, procedures and interpretations. They are of major importance for solving several questions and for carrying out various tasks of the science of special investigative activity and, first of all, for the materialization of its basic categories, to which the classification of special investigative measures is attributed. The circumstances in question determined the necessity and actuality of conducting a complex study of the classification of special investigative measures based on the analysis, interpretation and systematization of doctrinal opinions on this subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特别侦查措施的分类
特别侦查措施的分类问题对特别侦查工作的理论和实践具有重要意义。专业文献记载了基于不同理由对特殊侦查措施进行分类和分组安排的某些尝试,但总的来说,在特殊侦查活动理论中,对特殊侦查措施分类的相关问题研究不足,因此考虑将其纳入大量的科学研究。同样,行动-侦查学说也没有强调关于特别侦查措施分类的某种意见。这是因为特殊调查措施具有极其多样化的特征,它们是多种多样的,因此,该领域的每个专家都会提出自己的分类,并试图根据自己认为相关的经验和知识来证明这一点。专门侦查活动的概念和概念的完善过程必须建立在逻辑操作、程序和解释的基础上。它们对于解决若干问题和执行特殊侦查活动科学的各种任务具有重大意义,首先对于实现其基本类别具有重大意义,特殊侦查措施的分类就是基于这些基本类别。所涉情况决定了在对这一问题的理论意见进行分析、解释和系统化的基础上对特别调查措施的分类进行复杂研究的必要性和现实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of informational technologies in the education of drtainees: foreign experience and legal regulation Criminological specificity of war crimes, their difference from crimes against humanity and genocide Applicability of the ECHR case law within the judicial higher Court remedy examination Presumption of innocence in the doctrinal and regulatory sources of Western Europe (XIX-XX centuries) The presumption of lack of sexual consent in the case of a minor victim: a model of inspiration for the Moldovan legislator?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1