Human quality of life security as a cognitive category in security sciences

Janusz Gierszewski
{"title":"Human quality of life security as a cognitive category in security sciences","authors":"Janusz Gierszewski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0012.8095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in “quality of life” issues originated in the 1950s. The concept found applications in fields such as economics, social policy, medicine, sociology and psychology. Quality of life could perhaps also be an object of study for security sciences as well. Despite the continued popularity of this category, social scientists are yet to develop a commonly agreed upon definition of the concept. This paper constitutes an attempt at answering the question of whether the need for security is related to quality of life and whether it is valid to introduce a new conceptual category in the form of quality of life security. If so, then it is necessary to determine whether it is a measure that is subjective or objective. Human needs such as security and quality of life are what motivates human actions and activity. If one of the above needs is not being met, the individual become destabilised. The homogenisation and standardisation of scientific concepts would render it possible to compare data from an interdisciplinary point of view.\n\n","PeriodicalId":432439,"journal":{"name":"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.8095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Interest in “quality of life” issues originated in the 1950s. The concept found applications in fields such as economics, social policy, medicine, sociology and psychology. Quality of life could perhaps also be an object of study for security sciences as well. Despite the continued popularity of this category, social scientists are yet to develop a commonly agreed upon definition of the concept. This paper constitutes an attempt at answering the question of whether the need for security is related to quality of life and whether it is valid to introduce a new conceptual category in the form of quality of life security. If so, then it is necessary to determine whether it is a measure that is subjective or objective. Human needs such as security and quality of life are what motivates human actions and activity. If one of the above needs is not being met, the individual become destabilised. The homogenisation and standardisation of scientific concepts would render it possible to compare data from an interdisciplinary point of view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人的生活质量安全作为安全科学中的一个认知范畴
对“生活质量”问题的兴趣起源于20世纪50年代。这一概念在经济学、社会政策、医学、社会学和心理学等领域都有应用。生活质量或许也可以成为安全科学的研究对象。尽管这一类别一直很受欢迎,但社会科学家们尚未就这一概念的定义达成共识。本文试图回答以下问题:安全需求是否与生活质量有关,以及以生活质量安全的形式引入一个新的概念类别是否有效。如果是这样,那么就有必要确定它是主观的还是客观的度量。人类的需求,如安全和生活质量,是人类行为和活动的动力。如果上述需求之一没有得到满足,个体就会变得不稳定。科学概念的同质化和标准化将使从跨学科的角度比较数据成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Przemoc i agresja wśród nieletnich na przykładzie uczniów szkół specjalnych powiatu ostródzkiego Polski rynek pracy dla uchodźców z Ukrainy Teoria sekurytyzacji szkoły kopenhaskiej wobec terrorystycznej nieoczywistości na przykładzie amerykańskiej strategii zapobiegawczej Przemoc domowa wobec kobiet na przykładzie miasta Ostrołęka Rozwój zdolności w domenie kosmicznej przez potentatów kosmicznych
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1