通傳會「法規影響評估」的運作與限制

曾國峰 曾國峰
{"title":"通傳會「法規影響評估」的運作與限制","authors":"曾國峰 曾國峰","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 通傳會治理傳播與通訊市場,所制定的法案對於民眾、產業與社會均造成各種面向的衝擊,但過去甚少有研究檢視其立法機制是否合理,制定的規範有無達成政策目標。雖然法規影響評估(RIA)已經普遍應用在OECD國家,國發會也要求中央部會納入法規制定作業程序,但研究發現,通傳會與行政部會類似,仍會受到外部行政立法機關介入與利益團體遊說,而內部政務官與事務官權力不對等的從屬科層,以及缺乏量化數據與質性資料對產業與內容的分析能量,都不利於執行完整的法規影響評估。\n The National Communications Commission (NCC) regulates telecommunications and media services in Taiwan, and most of its laws and policies affect citizens, industries, and society. Few studies have explored the functionality of the legislative process and whether the laws serve their purpose, although several ministries have applied regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to the legislative process. This study discovered lobbies outside organizations, such as political parties and interest groups, reduce staff members’ professionalism and independence. In addition, bureaucratic culture and a lack of professionalism prevent RIA from being conducted in a timely manner. Therefore, the NCC should reorganize its staff, redistribute resources, and engage in dialogue with political appointees and ordinary civil servants to effectively regulate telecommunications and the media and produce high-quality laws and policies.\n \n","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中華傳播學刊","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

通傳會治理傳播與通訊市場,所制定的法案對於民眾、產業與社會均造成各種面向的衝擊,但過去甚少有研究檢視其立法機制是否合理,制定的規範有無達成政策目標。雖然法規影響評估(RIA)已經普遍應用在OECD國家,國發會也要求中央部會納入法規制定作業程序,但研究發現,通傳會與行政部會類似,仍會受到外部行政立法機關介入與利益團體遊說,而內部政務官與事務官權力不對等的從屬科層,以及缺乏量化數據與質性資料對產業與內容的分析能量,都不利於執行完整的法規影響評估。  The National Communications Commission (NCC) regulates telecommunications and media services in Taiwan, and most of its laws and policies affect citizens, industries, and society. Few studies have explored the functionality of the legislative process and whether the laws serve their purpose, although several ministries have applied regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to the legislative process. This study discovered lobbies outside organizations, such as political parties and interest groups, reduce staff members’ professionalism and independence. In addition, bureaucratic culture and a lack of professionalism prevent RIA from being conducted in a timely manner. Therefore, the NCC should reorganize its staff, redistribute resources, and engage in dialogue with political appointees and ordinary civil servants to effectively regulate telecommunications and the media and produce high-quality laws and policies.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通传会「法规影响评估」的运作与限制
通传会治理传播与通讯市场,所制定的法案对于民众、产业与社会均造成各种面向的冲击,但过去甚少有研究检视其立法机制是否合理,制定的规范有无达成政策目标。虽然法规影响评估(RIA)已经普遍应用在OECD国家,国发会也要求中央部会纳入法规制定作业程序,但研究发现,通传会与行政部会类似,仍会受到外部行政立法机关介入与利益团体游说,而内部政务官与事务官权力不对等的从属科层,以及缺乏量化数据与质性资料对产业与内容的分析能量,都不利于执行完整的法规影响评估。 The National Communications Commission (NCC) regulates telecommunications and media services in Taiwan, and most of its laws and policies affect citizens, industries, and society. Few studies have explored the functionality of the legislative process and whether the laws serve their purpose, although several ministries have applied regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to the legislative process. This study discovered lobbies outside organizations, such as political parties and interest groups, reduce staff members’ professionalism and independence. In addition, bureaucratic culture and a lack of professionalism prevent RIA from being conducted in a timely manner. Therefore, the NCC should reorganize its staff, redistribute resources, and engage in dialogue with political appointees and ordinary civil servants to effectively regulate telecommunications and the media and produce high-quality laws and policies.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
以公共政策介入手段扶持新聞業存續與發展:平台問責途徑與公共預算途徑的跨國比較 臺灣媒體報導新冠肺炎假訊息危機:混合法分析科技防疫之個資、隱私、資安議題 新聞人創業突圍:五種媒體模式的開創 營收破壞,流通依賴:數位平台對台灣報業與雜誌的經濟衝擊 假訊息管制與言論自由的平衡-— 美國網路中介責任的立法邊界探察與反思
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1