Only for casual players?: investigating player differences in full-body game interaction

R. Mizobata, Chaklam Silpasuwanchai, Xiangshi Ren
{"title":"Only for casual players?: investigating player differences in full-body game interaction","authors":"R. Mizobata, Chaklam Silpasuwanchai, Xiangshi Ren","doi":"10.1145/2592235.2592244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Full-body motion gestures enable realistic and intuitive input in video games. However, little is known regarding how different kinds of players engage/disengage with full-body game interaction. In this paper, adopting a user-typing approach, we explore player differences and their preferences in full-body gesture interaction (i.e., Kinect). Specifically, we hypothesize three human factors that influence player engagement in full-body game interaction, i.e., the player's motivation to succeed (achiever vs. casual player), motivation to move (mover vs. non-mover), and game expertise (gamer vs. non-gamer). To explore the hypotheses, we conducted an experiment where participants were tasked with playing three different video games supporting full-body game gestures. The results suggest a significant correlation and main effect of the three factors on players' engagement. The results also suggest three important game properties that affect players' preferences: level of cognitive challenge, level of physical challenge and level of realistic interaction.","PeriodicalId":167331,"journal":{"name":"Chinese CHI '14","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese CHI '14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2592235.2592244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Full-body motion gestures enable realistic and intuitive input in video games. However, little is known regarding how different kinds of players engage/disengage with full-body game interaction. In this paper, adopting a user-typing approach, we explore player differences and their preferences in full-body gesture interaction (i.e., Kinect). Specifically, we hypothesize three human factors that influence player engagement in full-body game interaction, i.e., the player's motivation to succeed (achiever vs. casual player), motivation to move (mover vs. non-mover), and game expertise (gamer vs. non-gamer). To explore the hypotheses, we conducted an experiment where participants were tasked with playing three different video games supporting full-body game gestures. The results suggest a significant correlation and main effect of the three factors on players' engagement. The results also suggest three important game properties that affect players' preferences: level of cognitive challenge, level of physical challenge and level of realistic interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只针对休闲玩家?:调查玩家在全身游戏互动中的差异
在视频游戏中,全身动作手势可以实现逼真和直观的输入。然而,关于不同类型的玩家如何参与/脱离全身游戏互动,我们却知之甚少。在本文中,我们采用用户输入方法,探索玩家在全身手势交互(即Kinect)方面的差异及其偏好。具体来说,我们假设有三个人为因素会影响玩家在全身游戏互动中的参与度,即玩家的成功动机(成就者vs休闲玩家)、移动动机(移动者vs非移动者)和游戏专业知识(玩家vs非玩家)。为了探索这些假设,我们进行了一项实验,让参与者玩三种不同的电子游戏,支持全身游戏手势。结果表明,这三个因素对玩家粘性具有显著的相关性和主要影响。研究结果还表明,影响玩家偏好的三个重要游戏属性是:认知挑战水平、身体挑战水平和现实互动水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eyes-free gesture passwords: a comparison of various eyes-free input methods Evaluating generation Y interaction qualities in an office work context Evaluating subtle cueing in head-worn displays commuCity: a social network system for the non-resident elderly in big cities in China Using grid visualization to organize visual data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1