Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession

A. Dodek, Emily Alderson
{"title":"Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession","authors":"A. Dodek, Emily Alderson","doi":"10.29173/ALR2448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the current state of Canadian legal services regulation and changes that are impacting it. The authors argue that the only legitimate purpose for legal services regulation is the protection of the public interest, and this goal is best achieved through risk regulation. The article discusses four roles risk plays in regulation: as an object of, and justification for, regulation, as an organizing principle, and as a measure of accountability. It includes practical examples and comparisons to other jurisdictions and professions. Finally, the authors recognize that substantial changes will be required to shift to a risk regulation regime for legal services, but that such a change is necessary.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ALR2448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the current state of Canadian legal services regulation and changes that are impacting it. The authors argue that the only legitimate purpose for legal services regulation is the protection of the public interest, and this goal is best achieved through risk regulation. The article discusses four roles risk plays in regulation: as an object of, and justification for, regulation, as an organizing principle, and as a measure of accountability. It includes practical examples and comparisons to other jurisdictions and professions. Finally, the authors recognize that substantial changes will be required to shift to a risk regulation regime for legal services, but that such a change is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律职业的风险监管
本文探讨了加拿大法律服务法规的现状和影响它的变化。作者认为,法律服务监管的唯一合法目的是保护公共利益,而这一目标最好通过风险监管来实现。本文讨论了风险在监管中扮演的四个角色:作为监管的对象和理由,作为组织原则,以及作为责任的衡量标准。它包括实际的例子和与其他司法管辖区和专业的比较。最后,作者认识到,要转变为法律服务的风险监管制度,需要进行实质性的变革,但这种变革是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to Canadian Government's Consultation on a Modern Copyright Framework for Online Intermediaries Legal Documents as Means of Financial Abstraction: How the Bankers’ Lawyers Constructed Swaps and Changed Finance Corporate Adolescence: Why Did 'We' not Work? AI Governance in Canadian Banking: Fairness, Credit Models, and Equality Rights Policy Forum: The Case for an Annual Net Wealth Tax
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1