Effects of Partial Replacement of Cement and Lime with some Agrowaste Ashes on the Geotechnical Behaviour of Lateritic Soil

E. O. Mezie, C. Nwaiwu, C. Nwakaire
{"title":"Effects of Partial Replacement of Cement and Lime with some Agrowaste Ashes on the Geotechnical Behaviour of Lateritic Soil","authors":"E. O. Mezie, C. Nwaiwu, C. Nwakaire","doi":"10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the optimum stabilizer content for a poor lateritic soil intended as subgrade material for a pavement was sought. The natural soil was first characterized and classified and the soil fall into the class of A-6 based on Nigeria General Specifications for Roads and Bridges (NGSRB) AASHTO soil class for pavement construction. The soil was stabilized at three binder points of 4%, 8% and 12% which coincided with specification limits for cement based on NGSRB with the range of 7-11% recommended for soils in the class A-6. The results from the compaction tests and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests show that the suitable stabilizer falls within the specified range of 7 – 11%. Binder contents/proportions of 4% RHA, 8% RHA, 8% (50R + 50O), 4% (60C/L + 40R/O), 8% (70C/L + 30R/O), 8% (0C/L + 100R/O), 8% (50C/L + 50R/O) gave the most promising results of MDUW and UCS. In other to carry out a comprehensive investigation of the properties of the soil to determine which of the promising binder contents/proportions would be most suitable as stabilizer for the soil, it was recommended that other qualifying tests of specific gravity, Atterberg limits, CBR, UCS, durability and permeability tests be carried out for these recommended binder contents/proportions.","PeriodicalId":437137,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the optimum stabilizer content for a poor lateritic soil intended as subgrade material for a pavement was sought. The natural soil was first characterized and classified and the soil fall into the class of A-6 based on Nigeria General Specifications for Roads and Bridges (NGSRB) AASHTO soil class for pavement construction. The soil was stabilized at three binder points of 4%, 8% and 12% which coincided with specification limits for cement based on NGSRB with the range of 7-11% recommended for soils in the class A-6. The results from the compaction tests and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests show that the suitable stabilizer falls within the specified range of 7 – 11%. Binder contents/proportions of 4% RHA, 8% RHA, 8% (50R + 50O), 4% (60C/L + 40R/O), 8% (70C/L + 30R/O), 8% (0C/L + 100R/O), 8% (50C/L + 50R/O) gave the most promising results of MDUW and UCS. In other to carry out a comprehensive investigation of the properties of the soil to determine which of the promising binder contents/proportions would be most suitable as stabilizer for the soil, it was recommended that other qualifying tests of specific gravity, Atterberg limits, CBR, UCS, durability and permeability tests be carried out for these recommended binder contents/proportions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粉煤灰部分替代水泥和石灰对红土岩土力学性能的影响
在这项研究中,寻找了一种用于路面路基材料的贫瘠红土的最佳稳定剂含量。首先对天然土壤进行了表征和分类,根据尼日利亚道路桥梁通用规范(NGSRB) AASHTO路面施工土壤等级,将土壤划分为A-6级。土在黏结点分别为4%、8%和12%的情况下稳定,黏结点与基于NGSRB的水泥规范限值一致,A-6级土壤推荐黏结点范围为7-11%。压实试验和无侧限抗压强度(UCS)试验结果表明,稳定剂的适宜范围为7 ~ 11%。4% RHA、8% RHA、8% (50R + 50O)、4% (60C/L + 40R/O)、8% (70C/L + 30R/O)、8% (0C/L + 100R/O)、8% (50C/L + 50R/O)是MDUW和UCS最理想的粘结剂含量/配比。为了对土壤特性进行全面调查,以确定哪种有希望的粘结剂含量/比例最适合作为土壤的稳定剂,建议对这些推荐的粘结剂含量/比例进行其他合格的比重、阿特伯格极限、CBR、UCS、耐久性和渗透性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laboratory Evaluation of the Hydraulic Conductivity as a Function of Changes in the Particle Size of a Cubitermes Sp Termite Mound Soil Treated with Lime Laboratory Evaluation of the Hydraulic Conductivity as a Function of Changes in the Particle Size of a Cubitermes Sp Termite Mound Soil Treated with Lime On-Grid Solar Traction System Experimental and Theoretical Shear Strength of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam Relationship between the Intrinsic Properties of Sands and the Parameters of Mathematical Particle Size Distribution Models for Predicting Geotechnical Quantities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1