With Maps and Mobs: Searching for Trustworthiness using Belief Spaces

Philip G. Feldman
{"title":"With Maps and Mobs: Searching for Trustworthiness using Belief Spaces","authors":"Philip G. Feldman","doi":"10.1145/3176349.3176353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detection of echo chambers and information bubbles is becoming increasingly relevant in this era of polarized information. It may be possible to evaluate information trustworthiness by examining the behavior of individuals in belief space rather than evaluating the information itself, which is a harder problem. To explore this, I propose to research a model for information retrieval that integrates two levels of information interaction. On the individual level, I leverage Munson and Resnick»s diversity-seeker, confirmer, and avoider patterns. At a group level, I integrate individual behaviors according to Moskivici»s work on crowd polarization. These perspectives have been integrated in a simulation that employs insights from animal collective behavior to model agent groups, which enable the systematic exploration of belief navigation behaviors that can be detected algorithmically. Viewing information retrieval from the perspective of belief spaces may shed light on current practices and lay out consideration for future design work.","PeriodicalId":198379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The detection of echo chambers and information bubbles is becoming increasingly relevant in this era of polarized information. It may be possible to evaluate information trustworthiness by examining the behavior of individuals in belief space rather than evaluating the information itself, which is a harder problem. To explore this, I propose to research a model for information retrieval that integrates two levels of information interaction. On the individual level, I leverage Munson and Resnick»s diversity-seeker, confirmer, and avoider patterns. At a group level, I integrate individual behaviors according to Moskivici»s work on crowd polarization. These perspectives have been integrated in a simulation that employs insights from animal collective behavior to model agent groups, which enable the systematic exploration of belief navigation behaviors that can be detected algorithmically. Viewing information retrieval from the perspective of belief spaces may shed light on current practices and lay out consideration for future design work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与地图和暴徒:使用信仰空间搜索可信度
在这个信息极化的时代,回声室和信息气泡的检测变得越来越重要。通过考察个体在信念空间中的行为而不是评估信息本身来评估信息的可信度是可能的,这是一个更难的问题。为了探索这一点,我建议研究一个集成了两个层次信息交互的信息检索模型。在个人层面上,我利用了Munson和Resnick的多样性寻求者、确认者和回避者模式。在群体层面上,我根据莫斯科维奇关于群体极化的研究整合个人行为。这些观点已经被整合到一个模拟中,该模拟利用了从动物集体行为到模型代理群体的见解,从而能够系统地探索可以通过算法检测到的信念导航行为。从信念空间的角度看待信息检索,可以为当前的实践提供启示,并为未来的设计工作提供思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction What Sources to Rely on:: Laypeople's Source Selection in Online Health Information Seeking Investigating Everyday Information Behavior of Using Ambient Displays: A Case of Indoor Air Quality Monitors Collaborative Information Seeking through Social Media Updates in Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1