Scientometric Analysis of the HAI Conference

Omar Mubin, Max Manalo, M. Ahmad, M. Obaid
{"title":"Scientometric Analysis of the HAI Conference","authors":"Omar Mubin, Max Manalo, M. Ahmad, M. Obaid","doi":"10.1145/3125739.3125747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The HAI conference is the premier discussion venue on the topic of Human Agent Interaction. In this paper we present our findings from the scientometric analysis of full papers from the HAI conference since its inception to date. We extracted various bibliometric measures and qualitatively coded our sample of 107 full papers over the 4 years of the conference. Our results show that the conference has not really grown rapidly and attracts papers from predominantly Asian Pacific regions. User studies were the common research methodology undertaken in HAI papers and humanoid robots are the popular agent of choice. Domains such as Education and Health were surprisingly underrepresented whereas communication was the focus of almost half of the papers. We also report on a mini comparison with the ICSR and IVA conference as a bench-marking strategy, which provides us with some reflections on how the HAI conference can be moved forward. In conclusion, we speculate on our findings and provide some insights to the organizers and steering committee of the HAI conference.","PeriodicalId":346669,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The HAI conference is the premier discussion venue on the topic of Human Agent Interaction. In this paper we present our findings from the scientometric analysis of full papers from the HAI conference since its inception to date. We extracted various bibliometric measures and qualitatively coded our sample of 107 full papers over the 4 years of the conference. Our results show that the conference has not really grown rapidly and attracts papers from predominantly Asian Pacific regions. User studies were the common research methodology undertaken in HAI papers and humanoid robots are the popular agent of choice. Domains such as Education and Health were surprisingly underrepresented whereas communication was the focus of almost half of the papers. We also report on a mini comparison with the ICSR and IVA conference as a bench-marking strategy, which provides us with some reflections on how the HAI conference can be moved forward. In conclusion, we speculate on our findings and provide some insights to the organizers and steering committee of the HAI conference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HAI会议的科学计量学分析
HAI会议是关于人机交互主题的主要讨论场所。在这篇论文中,我们展示了我们对HAI会议自成立至今的论文全文进行科学计量分析的发现。我们提取了各种文献计量方法,并对会议4年期间的107篇全文样本进行了定性编码。我们的研究结果表明,该会议并没有真正迅速发展,主要吸引来自亚太地区的论文。用户研究是人工智能论文中常用的研究方法,类人机器人是受欢迎的代理选择。令人惊讶的是,教育和卫生等领域的代表性不足,而通信是近一半论文的重点。我们还报告了与ICSR和IVA会议的小型比较,作为基准策略,这为我们提供了关于如何推进HAI会议的一些思考。总之,我们对我们的发现进行了推测,并为HAI会议的组织者和指导委员会提供了一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conversational Agent Learning Natural Gaze and Motion of Multi-Party Conversation from Example Keynote Talk Virtual Character Agent for Lowering Knowledge-sharing Barriers on Q&A Websites The Impact of Personalisation on Human-Robot Interaction in Learning Scenarios Human-Assisted Learning of Object Models through Active Object Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1