{"title":"The Phantom of the Russian Bonaparte","authors":"Jay Bergman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198842705.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 14 traces the evolution of the concept of Bonapartism. Marx and Engels thought it a remediable ‘wrong turn’ in history’s evolution that happily occurred only under capitalism; Louis Napoleon and Bismarck were its archetypical expressions. Initially, the Bolsheviks did not take issue with this characterization. But by the 1920s the Bolsheviks recognized that Bonapartism could also occur under socialism, and that the dictatorship it entailed would be a military one; the dictator would either be an army general or a civilian totally dependent on the military for his power. This caused the Bolsheviks to consider Napoleon Bonaparte, rather than Louis Napoleon, the prototypical Bonapartist in power. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the role the accusation of Bonapartism played in Khrushchev’s dismissal of Marshal Zhukov as Minister of Defence in 1957.","PeriodicalId":412145,"journal":{"name":"The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842705.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 14 traces the evolution of the concept of Bonapartism. Marx and Engels thought it a remediable ‘wrong turn’ in history’s evolution that happily occurred only under capitalism; Louis Napoleon and Bismarck were its archetypical expressions. Initially, the Bolsheviks did not take issue with this characterization. But by the 1920s the Bolsheviks recognized that Bonapartism could also occur under socialism, and that the dictatorship it entailed would be a military one; the dictator would either be an army general or a civilian totally dependent on the military for his power. This caused the Bolsheviks to consider Napoleon Bonaparte, rather than Louis Napoleon, the prototypical Bonapartist in power. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the role the accusation of Bonapartism played in Khrushchev’s dismissal of Marshal Zhukov as Minister of Defence in 1957.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄国波拿巴的幽灵
第十四章追溯了波拿巴主义概念的演变。马克思和恩格斯认为,这是历史发展中一个可补救的“错误转向”,只有在资本主义制度下才会愉快地发生;路易·拿破仑和俾斯麦是它的典型代表。最初,布尔什维克并没有对这种描述提出异议。但到了20世纪20年代,布尔什维克认识到,波拿巴主义也可能在社会主义下发生,而它所带来的独裁将是军事独裁;独裁者要么是军队将领,要么是完全依赖军队行使权力的平民。这导致布尔什维克认为拿破仑·波拿巴,而不是路易·拿破仑,典型的波拿巴主义者掌权。本章最后分析了波拿巴主义的指控在赫鲁晓夫1957年解除朱可夫元帅的国防部长职务中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mythologizing the New Soviet Regime The Marxist Inheritance of the French Revolution The Initial Reception of the French Revolution Returning to the Leninist Line under Khrushchev and Brezhnev 1917—Russian Jacobins Come to Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1