Developments in Judicial Review Practice and Procedure 2021

Kimberley Ziya
{"title":"Developments in Judicial Review Practice and Procedure 2021","authors":"Kimberley Ziya","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. There have been two cases dealing with the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to R (Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in the context of urgent applications. The Hamid case provided for a procedure by which the court could ask a legal representative – whether a solicitor or counsel – to show cause why the conduct of the legal representative should not be considered for referral to their respective regulatory body or otherwise be admonished.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2. There have been two cases dealing with the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to R (Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in the context of urgent applications. The Hamid case provided for a procedure by which the court could ask a legal representative – whether a solicitor or counsel – to show cause why the conduct of the legal representative should not be considered for referral to their respective regulatory body or otherwise be admonished.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法审查实践和程序的发展2021
2. 根据R (Hamid)诉内政部国务秘书一案,在紧急申请的情况下,有两起案件涉及法院的管辖权。哈米德案规定了一种程序,法院可以通过该程序要求法律代表- -无论是律师还是律师- -提出理由,说明为什么不应考虑将该法律代表的行为移交给其各自的监管机构或以其他方式予以训诫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1