Water Pollutants Discharge Permit Systems of the United States and China: A Comparison Using Referential Method

Ye Yuan, Yisong Li
{"title":"Water Pollutants Discharge Permit Systems of the United States and China: A Comparison Using Referential Method","authors":"Ye Yuan, Yisong Li","doi":"10.4236/blr.2020.112035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a referential method, a comparative study is carried out on the USA \nClean Water Act (CWA) and the PRC Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law (WPPCL). \nBoth laws employ a discharge permit system to achieve their respective \nenvironmental goals. The focus of the study is on the comparison of the \nCWA/National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System and the WPPCL/Water \nPollution Discharge Permit system. It is first pointed out that the comparison \nof environmental laws is not a “better-law comparison”. Instead, an \nenvironmental law in one country may be used as reference to examine how an \nenvironmental law in another country can be developed and implemented within \nthe respective legal framework. Comparison between the USA CWA/NPDES and the \nPRC WPPCL/WPDP is made from the perspectives of law objectives, implementation procedures \nand enforcement actions. Several recommendations are then made to better design \nand implement the permit system in China, with respect to ethical premise, \nconcrete law, discharge standards and enforcement.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.112035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a referential method, a comparative study is carried out on the USA Clean Water Act (CWA) and the PRC Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law (WPPCL). Both laws employ a discharge permit system to achieve their respective environmental goals. The focus of the study is on the comparison of the CWA/National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System and the WPPCL/Water Pollution Discharge Permit system. It is first pointed out that the comparison of environmental laws is not a “better-law comparison”. Instead, an environmental law in one country may be used as reference to examine how an environmental law in another country can be developed and implemented within the respective legal framework. Comparison between the USA CWA/NPDES and the PRC WPPCL/WPDP is made from the perspectives of law objectives, implementation procedures and enforcement actions. Several recommendations are then made to better design and implement the permit system in China, with respect to ethical premise, concrete law, discharge standards and enforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美水污染物排放许可制度:参照法比较
采用参考法,对美国《清洁水法》和中国《水污染防治法》进行了比较研究。两部法律均采用排放许可制度来实现各自的环境目标。研究的重点是CWA/国家污染物排放消除制度和WPPCL/水污染排放许可证制度的比较。首先指出环境法的比较不是“好法比较”。相反,一个国家的环境法可以作为参考,以审查如何在各自的法律框架内制定和执行另一个国家的环境法。从法律目标、实施程序和执法行动等方面对美国《公约》和中国《公约》进行了比较。然后,就道德前提、具体法律、排放标准和执行提出了若干建议,以便在中国更好地设计和实施许可证制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Law in Wildlife Management The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment —The Ongoing Erosion of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America The Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research: Ethics Guardians or Keystone Cops? Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1