EU Countries and the UK

M. Andenas
{"title":"EU Countries and the UK","authors":"M. Andenas","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter compares European Union countries to the United Kingdom. It aims at ascertaining not so much whether a common core exists but how it is shaped and evolves, also in response to influences by supranational legal orders. EU countries do not adhere to one model. Administrative law is subject to rapid development, and even countries that share many structures and general features do not develop at the same speed or in the same direction. In the UK, there is no specialized administrative court jurisdiction. There is one general court system that deals with civil, criminal, and administrative cases; but there are many administrative tribunals and appeals tribunals. Nearly all the EU countries have a specialised administrative court system, and the majority has a constitutional court. The chapter considers the perceived divide between civil law countries and the common law in the UK, in the light of the relationship between national law and EU and European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) law. It also looks at the four main features of the legal systems selected for comparison: the constitutional relevance of judicial review; the limitations of judicial review; procedural errors or omissions; and annulment and damages.","PeriodicalId":147116,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter compares European Union countries to the United Kingdom. It aims at ascertaining not so much whether a common core exists but how it is shaped and evolves, also in response to influences by supranational legal orders. EU countries do not adhere to one model. Administrative law is subject to rapid development, and even countries that share many structures and general features do not develop at the same speed or in the same direction. In the UK, there is no specialized administrative court jurisdiction. There is one general court system that deals with civil, criminal, and administrative cases; but there are many administrative tribunals and appeals tribunals. Nearly all the EU countries have a specialised administrative court system, and the majority has a constitutional court. The chapter considers the perceived divide between civil law countries and the common law in the UK, in the light of the relationship between national law and EU and European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) law. It also looks at the four main features of the legal systems selected for comparison: the constitutional relevance of judicial review; the limitations of judicial review; procedural errors or omissions; and annulment and damages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟国家和英国
本章将欧盟国家与英国进行比较。它的目的不在于确定共同核心是否存在,而在于确定共同核心是如何形成和演变的,这也是对超国家法律秩序影响的回应。欧盟国家并不坚持一种模式。行政法的发展是迅速的,即使是具有许多共同结构和一般特征的国家,其发展速度和方向也不尽相同。在英国,没有专门的行政法院管辖权。有一个一般的法院系统处理民事、刑事和行政案件;但是有许多行政法庭和上诉法庭。几乎所有的欧盟国家都有专门的行政法院系统,大多数国家都有宪法法院。本章根据国内法与欧盟和欧洲人权公约(ECHR)法律之间的关系,考虑了英国大陆法系国家和普通法之间的明显分歧。它还着眼于选择比较的法律制度的四个主要特征:司法审查的宪法相关性;司法审查的局限性;错误:程序上的错误或遗漏;以及婚姻无效和损害赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Belgium Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Ukraine The Common Core of European Administrative Laws and the Pan-European General Principles of Good Administration Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1