The Discrediting of Competing Trademarks - Between Multiple Qualification Option and Qualification Impediment

Iulian Moraru
{"title":"The Discrediting of Competing Trademarks - Between Multiple Qualification Option and Qualification Impediment","authors":"Iulian Moraru","doi":"10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discrediting competing trademarks consists in the spread of certain information regarding the trademarks owned by the competitor of the undertaking realising the disparaging actions. Relating the idea to the legislative provisions in force of the Republic of Moldova, it can be inferred that there are two options for qualifying such a conduct - according to the rules of unfair competition and in accordance with the rules of dishonest advertising. In such circumstances, the obvious question raised is whether the qualification will be done in accordance with one or another relevant legal norm. This aspect requires a broad clarification in the sense of offering viable alternative solutions and corresponding to the various practical factual situations. In this context, it is necessary to establish defined criteria in material and procedural terms in order to achieve a clear delimitation between different qualifying vectors. Circumstantially, there is a need to resort to the approach of domestic practice in this matter, as well as to the treatment of legislative, theoretical and practical trends in other states and legal systems.","PeriodicalId":385378,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discrediting competing trademarks consists in the spread of certain information regarding the trademarks owned by the competitor of the undertaking realising the disparaging actions. Relating the idea to the legislative provisions in force of the Republic of Moldova, it can be inferred that there are two options for qualifying such a conduct - according to the rules of unfair competition and in accordance with the rules of dishonest advertising. In such circumstances, the obvious question raised is whether the qualification will be done in accordance with one or another relevant legal norm. This aspect requires a broad clarification in the sense of offering viable alternative solutions and corresponding to the various practical factual situations. In this context, it is necessary to establish defined criteria in material and procedural terms in order to achieve a clear delimitation between different qualifying vectors. Circumstantially, there is a need to resort to the approach of domestic practice in this matter, as well as to the treatment of legislative, theoretical and practical trends in other states and legal systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争商标的名誉损害——多重资格选择与资格障碍之间的关系
诋毁竞争商标是指传播企业竞争对手所拥有商标的某些信息,从而实现诋毁行为。把这个想法同摩尔多瓦共和国现行的立法规定联系起来,可以推断,有两种办法来限制这种行为- -根据不公平竞争规则和根据不诚实广告规则。在这种情况下,提出的一个明显问题是,是否将按照一项或另一项有关的法律规范进行资格审查。这方面需要在提供可行的替代解决办法和与各种实际情况相对应的意义上进行广泛的澄清。在这方面,有必要在物质和程序方面确立明确的标准,以便在不同的限定向量之间实现明确的界限。在具体情况下,有必要在这个问题上采取国内实践的办法,以及对其他国家和法律制度的立法、理论和实践趋势的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in the development of the audit services market in the Republic of Moldova Models of interaction between the state of origin and the diaspora Peculiarities of the branches of law in ancient China Emerging trends in business and management consulting Foreign economic cooperation and development of the Republic of Korea through the conclusion of free trade agreements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1